Seasoned Advice is a question and answer site for professional and amateur chefs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

First, a confession: I work in software, so I'm probably paying way too much attention to the state of liquid that is "a simmer". That written, I love to cook, and no recipe direction gives me more confusion, sadness, and googling than "bring to a simmer". Accept no substitute. I find this to be the most vague direction in all of culinary science, and it drives what's left of my organized mind insane.

So here's the setting. I'm making vichyssoise, because I'm intrigued by the possibility of making a dish that has no color at all. I've been instructed to "bring to a boil and simmer the soup for 35 minutes."

The internet is filled with unsatisfying and at times contradictory answers. My research yields a few prototypical examples:

  1. "Simmer" means "low or off position," suggesting basically no heat at all.
  2. To "simmer" is to heat to a temperature point just off boiling, generally acknowledged as somewhere around 95 degrees C or something like 195 degrees F.
  3. "Simmer" is something like a "soft boil," a vague state that appears to be between "not bubbling" and "roiling", but which by definition must boil in some way, since you know, it's bubbling.

Each of these examples mean fundamentally different things. As far as I can tell, a "simmer" is a phase transition whereby the suspension in question, whatever the soup, sauce, or solid (apparently you "simmer" bratwurst, you never boil it) may be, cooks in a way that only years of experience or training can identify. Hence, my question:

What does "simmer" mean? Does it differ per recipe or is it universally defined?

EDIT: Did a bad copy/paste job from another window.

share|improve this question
Honestly, this is pretty clearly explained by Wikipedia so I'm not really sure where you looked. It could not possibly be simpler: bring to a boil then turn the temperature down to just above where the bubbles stop. – Aaronut Nov 27 '11 at 3:48
"Everything you wanted to know about boiling water":… – rumtscho Nov 27 '11 at 10:54
up vote 10 down vote accepted

Personally, I would argue that 2 and 3 are actually the same, and they are your answer.

If you heat a pan of water you'll notice the bubbles forming before the water is actually boiling, hence the talk of between not bubbling and full on roiling.

Also, when you're making your soup, it isn't pure water, so the boiling temp will not be a perfect 100 degrees C in any case.

So, I would say, that simmering is when you keep it just under a full boil. Watch what you're cooking, there should be gentle movement, but not a full roiling pan of whatever it is you're cooking.

To get something simmering away, you need to bring up to a full boil, then reduce the heat until you're getting movement, but not full bubbling.

share|improve this answer
So, this suggests a fundamental misunderstanding in my definition of "boil". Is not the point at which water bubbles its boiling point? Is it not boiling then? There's a "soft boil" and there's a "roiling boil". I haven't actually broken out the thermometer but I suspect the temperature is effectively the same. – Christopher Nov 27 '11 at 3:24
@ChristopherTiwald: See At what point is water considered "at a boil?" which you actually quoted in your question. A few bubbles is not a boil. Boiling means that all of the water is at 100° C (adjusted for altitude/purity/etc.). If you measure the water temperature you'll see that the first bubbles start to form at a much lower temperature than that. – Aaronut Nov 27 '11 at 3:44

Colloquially, simmer means to maintain a liquid at a temperature where relatively few, small vapor bubbles form, while boil means to maintain a liquid at a temperature where relatively many, large vapor bubbles form.

If the liquid is being stirred, the temperature of the liquid will be at its boiling point (100°C for distilled water, depending on atmospheric conditions) regardless of whether it is simmering or boiling. If the liquid is not being stirred, a liquid that appears to be simmering may have reached its boiling point near the heat source, causing vapor bubbles to form, but may not have reached its boiling point distal to the heat source. Thus the average temperature of the liquid may be below the boiling point.

Practically, food in a liquid that is simmering will be cooked at the same temperature or near the same temperature as food in a liquid that is boiling. Adding more heat to a liquid at its boiling point will not increase the liquid's temperature, but will increase the rate of vaporization, and hence the number and size of bubbles (at an extreme, detonating an atomic bomb next to your stove would cause the liquid (among other things) to essentially instantaneously vaporize). This leads to two differences in the cooking methods:

  1. A boiling liquid will reduce at a faster rate than a simmering liquid. If you are trying to reduce the liquid's volume, boiling may be preferred. If not, simmering may be preferred.
  2. The larger and more numerous bubbles of a boiling liquid can physically harm delicate food items. Delicate noodles and vegetables may be more damaged in a boiling liquid than in a simmering liquid. Potatoes are less prone to such damage.

Returning to the three potential definitions that your research found:

  1. "Simmer means low or off position" - This statement is false, but is derived from common labeling on stove ranges. On some ranges, the temperature dials will be labelled 'simmer' at their lowest setting. This should be thought of as 'maintain simmer'. The idea is that after a liquid is brought to an obvious boil, the temperature is at its boiling point. By turning the heat off, energy is lost as the liquid vaporizes and escapes into the atmosphere, causing the temperature of the liquid to gradually fall below its boiling point. By maintaining a minimal amount of heat at the lowest 'simmer' setting, the energy lost through vaporization can be replaced, maintaining the liquid at its boiling point. In my experience, this tends to work well for liquids in a pot with a small surface area. However, for liquids in pots with a large surface area, significant heat is also lost through radiation, and I'll have to turn the dial up to the '1' or '2' setting to maintain the boiling point.
  2. "To simmer is to heat to a temperature point just off boiling, generally acknowledged as somewhere around 95 degrees C or something like 195 degrees F." - This statement is generally true. As noted above, if vapor bubbles are forming in a liquid, at least part of it is at its boiling point. So, it is possible for the bottom of a pot of water to reach 100°C while the top of the pot is only 90°C, and perhaps the average temperature of the entire pot of water is around 95°C. Stirring the water distributes the heat evenly, and a simmering, stirred pot of water will be uniformly at 100°C.
  3. "'Simmer' is something like a 'soft boil', a vague state that appears to be between 'not bubbling' and 'roiling', but which by definition must boil in some way, since you know, it's bubbling." - I think this is mostly in line with how I have described the difference between simmering and boiling above.

I would casually define the two terms as follows:

  • To simmer is to add the minimal amount of energy to maintain a liquid at its boiling point, resulting in few, relatively small vapor bubbles.
  • To boil is to add additional energy to a liquid that is already at its boiling point, resulting in many, relatively large vapor bubbles.

To learn about the science behind cooking, I recommend Harold McGee's On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen.

share|improve this answer

I think that the term is usually used like, eg "bring to a boil then simmer for 5 minutes" would be, when you boil something you would normally do it on high heat...but after the ingredients are put in the pot, depending on the food you would sometimes keep the fire burning strong "boil", or "simmer" it at low heat. So the food still cooks but the liquid does not evaporate as speedily. So if you are following a recipe where it says to simmer for 10 minutes, but you keep the pot a full boil, then a lot of the liquid would evaporate resulting in a different then "recipe ideal" flavor, consistency turn out.

share|improve this answer
More than that, a boil is hotter than a simmer, so you may also wind up with overcooked food. Its also less gentle, so that may destroy delicate items. – derobert Nov 27 '11 at 8:27
@derobert: That's not true. The water temperature while simmering and boiling are both the same at 100°C. Vigorously boiling water is not hotter than a gently simmering water; the only difference between boiling and simmering is the rate at which the water evaporates and the amount of internal movement due to the bubbles. Generally, you won't overcook by boiling instead simmering, but you may end up with incorrect thickness of the soup or the physical movement of the bubbles may destroy soft foods. – Lie Ryan Dec 31 '13 at 16:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.