Take the 2-minute tour ×
Seasoned Advice is a question and answer site for professional and amateur chefs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I hope that this is the right place to ask this question. My problem is that I wish to plan a diet for myself but - nearly - every database has different values for the same food. How do I know which one is accurate?

For example if I check bodybuilding.com for raw eggs: Eggs on bodybuilding.com and on the USDA webpage: USDA entry for raw eggs I get different values for the same thing.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

Different websites will have different many different factors, including how they calculate their final numbers, such is the problem with any scientific data. For your diet, though, don't worry about it too much. If your diet is so strict that the minor differences in nutrition facts make that much of a difference, then will you have the energy to stick with it in the long term?

Every egg is different, so the chances of the one you eat exactly matching either of those sites is nil. Not to mention that the accuracy of those numbers depends on you measuring ingredients with equal accuracy.

Use the database to learn quick estimates for the foods you commonly eat, so you can make decisions without the computer nearby. If you are out eating, knowing that an egg has about 75 calories and 5 grams of fat, for example, lets you decide how many you want.

Edit: If you are looking for another database, though, the search at Wolfram Alpha has many foods. Try typing something like "bread nutrition."

share|improve this answer

You should generally trust the USDA. They've put a lot of effort into getting everything accurately measured for nutrition labeling, and in the US at least, pretty much everyone gets their nutrition data from them.

That's true in this case: the bodybuilding.com nutrition page says "This database contains data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service." So there's no good reason they should disagree with the USDA - if they do, I'd assume it's because their data is out of date, or they miscopied it from the USDA database.

That said, the differences are pretty tiny (pretty much insignificant in this case), so assuming they haven't made any big mistakes, you should be fine using either - it's supposed to be the same data. (Personally, I would much prefer the USDA's website or http://nutritiondata.self.com/ because they're a lot easier to read than that bodybuilding site.)

share|improve this answer
    
You could register (free) in both nutritiondata.self.com and cronometer.com to have a good idea. (They both fetch their data in USDA database but you will find some lights differences due to their final calculation. There is some weird difference with Calcium for instance) Pro cronometer.com: it's easier to change the quantities (editable table). It has a super important feature: by mousing over on a specific it shows all its intake sources (eg: you see where you got your calcium from your diet). You can also add Vit supplement in your diet. –  Guillaume Combot Jul 21 at 7:33
    
pro nutritiondata.self.com: its shows glycemic load, and it has interesting graphs and it is globally more detailed (eg on fats). And you could download your diet profile. –  Guillaume Combot Jul 21 at 7:33

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.