Take the 2-minute tour ×
Seasoned Advice is a question and answer site for professional and amateur chefs. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I saw this this question, and a few others, but there aren't any explanations I can find that say whether the two are treated differently or not. In other words, can they be used as a direct substitute?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It depends on what you mean by "yam".

Once upon a time, in the deep south of the US, there was a tuber known as the sweet potato, and it was good. And then one particular grower decided to sell theirs under the trade name "yam" to get better marketing recognition. This lead to some folks in the US calling sweet potatoes by the name yam, especially in the context of candied yams (a sweet casserole of spiced sweet potato).

So if the word "yam" is being used to mean a variety of sweet potato, then they are culinary identical. Sweet potatoes of all variety are, well, potato sized (or a bit bigger than the average potato), and their color can range from whitish through yellow, orangish or reddish. Most grocery store varieties are fairly orange in color.

True yams originate from Africa, and are far more starchy and fibrous than sweet potatoes, no matter what they are called, and are used in entirely different ways. They can be very large, football to basketball sized or larger. There are also a tremendous variety of true yams.

share|improve this answer
2  
No, these are yams en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxalis_tuberosa ... maybe there is no standardi(s/z)ed world language yet :-) –  TFD Aug 10 '13 at 2:03
    
Actually, that is a 3rd vegetable by that name. From the context of the question, however, I assumed US usages. –  SAJ14SAJ Aug 10 '13 at 2:03
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.