Seasoned Advice is a question and answer site for professional and amateur chefs. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In making a brine for my chicken, I came across a lot of recipes that call for sugar in the brine. I understand the general idea behind brining, but don't understand what benefit the sugar provides.

In this answer, @papin links to a PDF that states the following (emphasis mine):

The law of diffusion states that the salt and sugar will naturally flow from the area of greater concentration (the brine) to lesser concentration (the cells). There is also a greater concentration of water, so to speak, outside of the turkey than inside. Here, too, the water will naturally flow from the area of greater concentration (the brine) to lesser concentration (the cells). When water moves in this fashion, the process is called osmosis. Once inside the cells, the salt and, to a lesser extent, the sugar cause the cell proteins to unravel, or denature. As the individual proteins unravel, they become more likely to interact with one another. This interaction results in the formation of a sticky matrix that captures and holds moisture.

This makes it sound like sugar isn't really an important part of the osmosis process.

Is there a chemical/molecular reason to add the sugar, or is it just to add some flavor to the chicken breast?

share|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The sugar is simply used for flavoring; the fact that it helps brine to a lesser extent is just an added bonus. The sugar also aids in browning via the Maillard reaction, though this can also result in burning in a high heat application.

I suggest brining two boneless skinless chicken breasts -- one in a salt-only brine and the other with the salt & sugar brine suggested by Cook's Illustrated. You should notice a difference in both flavor and appearance.

share|improve this answer
Sugar has nothing to do with Maillard. Sugar browning is caramelization. Maillard reactions only occur with proteins. /nitpick. – daniel Sep 24 '10 at 21:57
@roux: You'll see that sugar has everything to do with the Maillard reaction; the reaction cannot even happen in the absence of sugar. You'll see this and other detailed information in the section titled "Foods and products with Maillard reactions". – hobodave Sep 24 '10 at 22:32
I am going on what I have read in McGee and in other places. Sorry, but I trust McGee over Wikipedia. The Miallard reaction--browning of meats--is a physically different set of chemical and physical processes than the phase-changes of sugar (as in table, white, sugar) when heat is applied. The end results are similar, yes, but the pathways to get there are different. – daniel Sep 24 '10 at 23:18
According to wikipedia, the Maillard reaction is a chemical reaction between and amino acid and a reducing sugar, using requiring heat. Note that sucrose (table sugar) is not a reducing sugar. So if that is what is in the brine, is has nothing to do with Maillard. – Mark Sep 26 '10 at 1:02
@Mark: The assumption you make in your last sentence is incorrect. Sucrose, along with all of the other polysaccharides still participate in the Maillard reaction, albeit with much less noticeable effect. This is noted in great detail here, here, and here. The latter of which is an actual reference for the very high level Wikipedia article. – hobodave Sep 26 '10 at 1:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.