Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 5, 2021 at 0:20 answer added Agnes timeline score: 0
Aug 30, 2018 at 11:51 answer added user68975 timeline score: 1
Apr 17, 2018 at 19:55 answer added Ben timeline score: -1
Aug 5, 2016 at 20:47 answer added paparazzo timeline score: 0
Aug 5, 2016 at 14:54 answer added user49546 timeline score: 0
May 10, 2016 at 2:00 answer added user45680 timeline score: 0
Mar 19, 2015 at 21:28 comment added Rorschach120 If you want to avoid this and cook much faster, get a pressure cooker! They are amazing and you'll never use a CrockPot again.lifehacker.com/5954077/…
Oct 4, 2014 at 6:58 answer added hippytea timeline score: 15
Feb 21, 2012 at 8:15 comment added Chef Flambe ANY meat cooked for hours at low temperature will loose all it's juices to the broth around it. The "moist" meats which you have had, are a reflection on the connective tissue content of the meat being cooked. Slow cooking methods allow for it to disolve and be eddible as opposed to tough string like bands of yuk. Get a lamb shank and cook it at 250F for 4 hours and it's great. Get a tenderloin and do the same it "tastes" dry and yuk but it's as tender or more so than the shank. The shank has just so much more connective tissue and it doesn't leach out so makes it taste moister.
Feb 21, 2012 at 6:05 comment added Cascabel I think there's some lack of clarity in the answers because "beef roast" is a pretty vague term.
Feb 21, 2012 at 0:59 answer added Steggo timeline score: 10
Feb 20, 2012 at 10:44 answer added Gabe timeline score: -2
Feb 20, 2012 at 5:24 answer added rfusca timeline score: 23
Feb 20, 2012 at 2:38 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackCooking/status/171423434998431745
Feb 20, 2012 at 2:15 history edited TFD CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body; edited title
Feb 20, 2012 at 2:14 answer added TFD timeline score: 1
Feb 20, 2012 at 1:31 history asked Nerdtron CC BY-SA 3.0