Prepackaged microwave food typically says to microwave on high for n seconds. It usually says that the instructions are meant for an 1100 watt microwave (give or take).

My microwave is only 950 watts.

What is the equation for me to get the new time? Is it time x (1100 / 950)?

  • 1
    Waw, I have an 1100 watt microwave and all instruction I have ever seen mention 650 or 800 watt machines. – Willeke Apr 2 at 4:28
  • 1
    @Willeke I guess microwave wattages vary based on location. – Evorlor Apr 2 at 4:36
  • My Stouffer’s frozen dinner says the instructions are for an 1100 watt microwave. – pacoverflow Apr 2 at 6:09
  • A quick Google seems to show that US nukes are often 1100w. There don't seem to be many of those in the EU other than commercial usage [1850 seems common]. 'Regular' over here is 800w [& that seems to be what all the general package instructions are based on], I specifically went for a 'powerful' one at 1000w. The only 1100w I can find are all combis of some sort - maybe the 'extra' power is used with the grill running?? independent.co.uk/extras/indybest/house-garden/… for some examples – Tetsujin Apr 2 at 7:23
  • For a really accurate calculation you probably also need to take the power efficiency of the device into account (power consumption does not equal the output of the magnetron), also the density, spatial distribution and the water content of the food as well as the thermal and electromagnetic properties of the plate. Or you just take the instructions as a rough estimate and apply a sensoric assessment to figure out when the cooking is done. – J. Mueller Apr 2 at 16:15

Simple answer

The same equation, because the power or wattage between both your microwave and the reference/recipe microwave are close enough that your formula would be a decent estimate of time with some "tolerable" error (and will work for any case this happens).

Technically speaking this means you just estimated cooking time by thinking it would behave linearly when the power between microwaves isn't that different, which is a decent estimate with some error (but also not really true and mistaken for whenever this doesn't happen).

Elaborate answer

For your specific case (owning a 950W microwave and having 1100W instructions) even though mathematically speaking an 86% difference (950/1100*100) in wattage seems like much, when you take into any consideration the available data like this one (source)

Microwave cook times for different powers

Notice that you can literally validate your formula by checking the data. So if for example you have a 1000W and you have a recipe with 3.10 minutes of cooking time tested with 1200W microwave, your formula estimates the cooking time to be 3.10*1.2=3.72 minutes, but the actual time in the table implies you're off because the real time is 4.03 minutes. So like I said before, decent estimate with tolerable error.

However, in reality cooking time in a microwave behaves non-linearly and thus, whenever the difference of wattage gets larger your formula doesn't work.

To give a formula for that case is harder when you realize the amount of variables to take into account, so this is why tables like the one above exist to give you some perspective of the cooking times. One would think that the table above solves the whole problem, but realize that those are cooking times for a specific food (baked potato); so if you have a food with no data I'd say experimentation is advisable at your own risk :D.

PS: I'm a mathematical engineer who likes cooking and just wanted to provide another perspective on the matter. Hope it helps!


In general, microwave meals are designed to be cooked to a safe temperature throughout, even when a microwave barely puts out the rated power, and that unevenly. This means the meals are designed to handle overcooking. Anyway power ratings are fairly inaccurate as they depend on how well the microwave radiation couples into the food - ratings are based around a defined portion though, so a ready meal isn't as likely to be poorly heated as something smaller.

So one simple approach is to follow the instructions for the highest power stated. This will work well for some things.

You can't assume you can just reduce the time in the same ratio the power is increased, because heat conduction is needed to cook the middle. This is particularly true if starting from frozen, or if it's something you can't stir.

What works for mine (1100W I think) is to use the 900 or 950W instructions, but reduce the time by a little - 30s on a typical single portion that cooks for 5-7 minutes , 1min on bigger things or from frozen, 10s on a dessert that heats up in 40-60s.

Crucially though, this is what I've concluded after trying it - stopping when stuff is bubbling, and checking it's hot through.

If the instructions are for a higher power than you have available, start by following them, then check. It may actually be hot enough but if not, give it a little longer, in the same increments as above (which are only a suggestion). You may find that you consistently need to add the same extra time for the meals you eat, once you've tested

  • 3
    +1 for the general instruction but OP has a less powerfull microwave, so will have to lengthen heating time. – Willeke Apr 2 at 8:13
  • +1 for follow the instructions for the highest power stated. – Anastasia Zendaya Apr 2 at 15:21
  • @Willeke good point, that's easier so I'll add a paragraph. Here I almost never see instructions for more than 950W – Chris H Apr 2 at 15:23
  • Usually, if you have a microwave that has higher power than needed it's easier to just use a lower power setting to match the instructions... You know, not everything needs to be blasted with full power :) – Luciano Apr 9 at 8:40
  • 1
    @Luciano that's only sometimes an option. Mine uses vague descriptions rather than percentages, so turning down the power to match the product instructions means finding the manual for the microwave, or guessing. When I do find the manual, I realise that there's no medium-high setting that would give 800-900W; it jumps from about 600W to 1000W, so it ends up slower than a lower power microwave. – Chris H Apr 9 at 8:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.