Would the high temperature (400 Celsius) of a self-cleaning oven (pyrolytic function) be of any use for cooking certain foods, like pizza? That would emulate a wood pizza oven, making pizza in 2 min.

  • 7
    There's definitely a guy who's written about doing this online. It requires defeating the lock on the oven. And apparently it's not very good for the oven, and causes a lot of wear on it. Commented Feb 4 at 18:40
  • 4
    I remember seeing a detailed written description of how to do this long before YouTube existed. It required using a bolt cutter (IIRC) to cut a cable to disable the safety latch.
    – arp
    Commented Feb 6 at 1:57

6 Answers 6


Unfortunately, most (all?) ovens with a self-clean function also have an automatic lock that engages and stays engaged until it has completed and reaches a safe temperature, or a manual lock that must be engaged before turning in the clean function. See here for some info from GE on the subject.

It may be possible to do with a manual lock, though it’s unclear to me whether that would work. And while it’s technically possible to disable the auto-lock, I can’t recommend disabling safety mechanisms like that.

If you did have an oven that could reach such temperatures, I think it would functionally work like you propose, but I’d avoid tampering with an oven and would suggest instead suggest something intended for those purposes.

  • 1
    I don't know that it's unfortunate. The locks are that way for reasons. And I'm pretty sure the manual ones have thermostatic elements that make them "not manually unlockable when too hot."
    – Ecnerwal
    Commented Feb 4 at 13:59
  • 15
    @Ecnerwal I suppose that’s more specifically “unfortunately for your dreams of cooking pizza in a superheated oven” Commented Feb 4 at 21:53
  • @Ecnerwal for many safety features there isn't really a good reason, they're only put in place because the manufacturer doesn't want to get the bad PR or court case when some user does something very stupid and then claims the device didn't sufficiently protect against the consequences. Commented Feb 6 at 17:38
  • 2
    But the user intends to do something the manufacturer considers very stupid. Which might well hurt them. So it's actually a very good reason to make it very clear that they deliberately defeated a safety mechanism to do that.
    – Ecnerwal
    Commented Feb 6 at 18:29

Jeffrey Steingarten tried this, but was stymied by the thermostatic door lock:

Not long afterward, I slid a raw pizza into a friend's electric oven, switched on the self-cleaning cycle, locked the door, and watched with satisfaction as the temperature soared to 800°. Then, at the crucial moment, to defeat the safety latch and retrieve my perfectly baked pizza, I pulled out the plug and, protecting my arm with a wet bath towel, tugged on the door. Somehow, this stratagem failed, and by the time we had got the door open again half an hour later, the pizza had completely disappeared, and the oven was unaccountably lined with a thick layer of ash. I feel that I am on to something here, though, as with the controlled use of hydrogen fusion, the solution may remain elusive for many years.

  • 3
    Somehow, the ash lining inside the oven doesn't seem "unaccountable" to me.... Commented Feb 6 at 7:47
  • 6
    I would describe Steingarten's writing style as self-consciously, humorously pompous, and part of the schtick is the implication that the outcome couldn't possibly be the result of his poor judgment.
    – coneslayer
    Commented Feb 6 at 14:40
  • 2
    Not an expert, but "wet towel" as a protection against 800c ambient air sounds like a recipe for flash steam burns: the towel will hold the heat and the water will transfer the heat very quickly..
    – Yorik
    Commented Feb 6 at 19:12
  • 6
    @Yorik "US food writer" hence 800 means 800F (426C or about 700K)
    – James K
    Commented Feb 6 at 20:48

I recall listening to a podcast several years ago (probably The Splendid Table, an NPR show in podcast form) in which they discussed the possibility of cooking a pizza using the self-clean cycle of an oven. Unfortunately, I cannot currently find a link to this interview (nor any record of it on the internet, so perhaps I am hallucinating). However, my recollection was that the author had bypassed the locking mechanism for the oven door (not hard to do) and used the self-clean cycle to cook a pizza.

With the unfortunate side effect of destroying the glass in the oven door due to thermal shock.

The moral of the story is that you can cook a pizza using the self-clean cycle, but it is very likely to damage your oven, and is probably a bad idea. If you really want to cook a pizza in a very hot oven, get an oven which is designed for this.

It may also be a bad idea to use an oven's self-clean cycle, in general. [1] [2] As an anecdote, in the four years since I moved into my current home, I have used the self-clean cycle a few times. I have twice had to replace a $100 part in the oven, which (after the second replacement) I was told was being broken due to the high heat of the self-clean cycle. I don't use that feature any more. :/

  • Just curious, what was the $100 part you had to replace?
    – MaxD
    Commented Feb 5 at 19:41
  • 5
    @MaxD Oh, gosh... I'd have to go back and look at the invoice. It was some bit of electronics on a breadboard. The electrician who did the work seemed to think that there is just no way of sufficiently insulating the electronic controls for the oven from the high heat of the self-clean cycle, and admonished me to never use the self-clean cycle again (he then retracted that statement, and indicated that he would be more than happy to take my money to fix my oven every so often). Commented Feb 5 at 19:52
  • An oven with a self-clean cycle that destroys parts in the oven itself is just a faulty design, no? Sure it is possible to design ovens that survive such high temperatures or higher, like the electric furnaces used to melt metals like bronze. Whether it is practical to put the bulky insulation required for it into a home oven is a different question. Commented Feb 6 at 17:42
  • 2
    @leftaroundabout Yes, I agree that it is bad design, but it seems to be a problem with many modern consumer-grade ovens. From among the first couple of Google results: thekitchn.com/… and mrappliance.com/wichita/blog/2023/november/… . Note that older ovens don't have the need to insulate sensitive electronics, as they were mechanical. I wonder if the self-clean option is a holdover from earlier models, which causes problems now. Commented Feb 6 at 17:53

I used to do it all the time, and did it hundreds of times (until I got better solutions). Even when I was renting a small apartment the modification to bypass the nanny-device that keeps the oven closed was very simple to do.

It's an OK method but the main drawback is the lack of control; this self-cleaning function uses a deep hysteresis and temperature inside can vary quite a lot, especially if you open and close the door often. In particular, when you insert the pizza you want to have the broiler going on at max power for best results and the self cleaning feature rarely is synchronized with that. However, it is still much better than the regular function of the oven.

Regarding longevity of the appliance: I once had to fix a component on the control board of the oven. Who knows if that chip (a 40 US cents darlington array to drive the relays) was damaged by the heat of the cleaning cycles or if it would have broken anyway - I tend to think the latter. My point is that appliances are made to be used and even if you had to fix an oven, it would still be an order of magnitude cheaper than having to go to a pizza restaurant :) I still use the cleaning function regularly to actually clean the oven and haven't had problems since I replaced that component.

  • 1
    You're lucky. A lot of electronic parts on other ovens are proprietary and not replacable with off-the-shelf electronics. You could have been facing needing a $300 circuit board replacement.
    – FuzzyChef
    Commented Feb 5 at 19:59
  • 3
    In my experience oven boards and power boards in general use commonly available discrete electronics that are very easy to replace. The chip in question was an ST Microelectronics part but equivalents are available from other manufacturers. I understand that most people would just replace the whole board, what I am saying is that I believe that failure would have happened anyway. In fact, as I have a double oven, I only used the pyrolitic function to cook on the bottom one, and the board is located on top of the upper one. Commented Feb 5 at 22:20
  • 1
    Alessio: you've never had a KitchenAid, Whirlpool, or similar oven then. All undocumented parts, soldered or epoxied to the board.
    – FuzzyChef
    Commented Feb 5 at 23:01
  • 2
    This is a Kenmore. The component was a DIP chip soldered down to the board. When I replaced it I added a socket for my own convenience. Commented Feb 6 at 6:37

One method I have heard (on Alton Brown Good eats?) used on a warm summer days is to heat food safe bricks inside the oven on the clean cycle, and then put the bricks on the ground outside and bake pizzas right on top. I believe you can get 3-4 pizzas done on them before they cool. I don't think it is required to cover them, but I'd imagine something like the top to a charcoal grill would help.

Obviously there are big risks inherent in using this method and quite frankly it probably isn't worth attempting anymore given the proliferation of cheap good quality outdoor pizza ovens.


Alex French Guy did this with an oven. The drawback was that, due to the need to disable the safety locks and thermostats, plus wear & tear, the oven wasn't useful for anything else afterwards.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.