The Seasoned Advice answer to Why add salt to the water when cooking pasta? is that it makes the pasta less sticky by inhibiting starch gelatinization. This seems to be a controversial question, with lots of improperly sourced answers spreading.

Is there an authoritative source, such as published experiments, chemical treatises or work by famous cooks, that gives a final verdict on whether adding salt really does affect the starch gelatinization, thus making the pasta less sticky?

(I was thinking about posting this on skeptics.SE, but I think this is where the expertise is.)

  • 1
    As it stands, this question is an exact duplicate of the question you linked to with the word "authoritative" added. I do understand the motivation here - you want reliable sources and the original answers had none - but it's still the same question. If you're doubting the premise stated by the accepted answer (i.e. that the salt affects starch gelation) then that would be a great question to ask. Please consider rewording this to explain exactly what it is that you want proven or disproven.
    – Aaronut
    Apr 22, 2011 at 20:06
  • @Aaronut: Thanks, I've reworded the question to emphasize that this question is narrower. Another reason that I didn't just comment on the answer to the other question is that only the original answerer would see it.
    – user4697
    Apr 22, 2011 at 20:15
  • Perfect - this is a lot more focused.
    – Aaronut
    Apr 22, 2011 at 20:21
  • 2
    Whilst the gelatinisation in the presence of salt is scientifically interesting. Leaving salt out of pasta cooking renders it next to inedible for most people on a taste basis, so the whole issue is generally academic.
    – Orbling
    Apr 22, 2011 at 23:50
  • 1
    @Orbling: It is true that many people find pasta to be excessively bland without salt, but "most" is a heavy generalization; people who don't eat a lot of salty foods are less likely to have a problem with it. I'm fairly well accustomed to unsalted pasta myself, although I tend to eat the whole wheat variety.
    – Aaronut
    Apr 23, 2011 at 1:56

2 Answers 2


Starch is extensively well-researched in food science, so the short answer is yes, there is an authoritative source; there are a myriad of authoritative sources.

The caveat (there's always a caveat) is that food scientists are doing controlled experiments using far more sophisticated methods than pasta and a boiling pot, and they tend to be primarily interested in more theoretical questions than this, because there are an absurd number of variables at work in your own kitchen:

  • Type and quantity of pasta;
  • Purity and quantity of the water;
  • Type, purity, and quantity of salt;
  • Water temperature;
  • Cooking time;
  • And so on...

So, really, to a scientist, the question "does adding salt to pasta water reduce sticking?" is bordering on ridiculous. The answer is, as the answer often is, it depends.

The following is taken from Starch: Chemistry and Technology, an academic tome that is all about - you guessed it - starch.

Effects of salts on gelatinization are more complex than those of nonionic solutes, as they are solute-specific and concentration-dependent. For most electrolytes, an increase in gelatinization temperature, Tm, is found at low salt concentrations. At high salt concentrations, Tm decreases and can even drop below the initial value.

[...] In general, the effect of neutral salts on starch gelatinization follows the order of the classical Hofmeister (lyotropic) series, particularly in the case of anions. [...but] cations of different chloride salts exhibit a more complicated behavior as evidenced with polarizing microscopy.


In plain English: Adding a little salt might reduce the gelation and thus sticking. Adding a lot of salt might increase gelation and sticking. The definition of "a little" and "a lot" depends on how much and what kinds of starch are in the pasta, what else might be in the pasta (some already have salt!), how dispersed the starch already is in the water, what kind of salt you're using... you get the idea.

Incidentally, here's the Hofmeister series that the above refers to:

Hofmeister Series


Table salt is sodium chloride - NaCl. You'll notice that Na+ is about halfway to the "salt out" side and Cl- is right smack in the middle. So, even with my limited understanding of all the mechanics at work, it does stand to reason that the effects of having both would be unpredictable. It's easier to predict the effects when you have something like calcium perchlorate, i.e. Ca(ClO4)2, where both the anions and cations are on the "salt in" side. Obviously, those kinds of salts are not in your average home kitchen and I doubt that they're even used in commercial food plants.

...although there are other well-known culinary salts other than sodium chloride, including ammonium chloride AKA salmiac, the (in)famous "salty liquorice" salt. That is technically still "salt". Which salt you choose will of course have wildly different effects on chemical properties including starch interaction.

So hopefully this helps explain some of the wildly opposing anecdotal reports you've read. There is no simple answer because your kitchen is not controlled conditions. However, there is some truth to the statement that salt inhibits starch gelation. It might have that effect, at the right concentration and with the right set of ingredients.

  • Thanks, this is what I was looking for. I don't have the book -- does it say anything about the relation between salt concentration and starch gelation in the special case of NaCl and 100 degrees?
    – user4697
    Apr 23, 2011 at 7:34
  • @Tim: There's a little more information about NaCl on the page I quoted from (click the source link), but that's about it. Keep in mind that when you say "100 degrees" - often with these experiments, the gelatinization temperature (Tm) is exactly what they're measuring, so the question is self-defeating. Again, I don't think there's really a definitive answer because even if the theory said one thing, you are almost never working with pure NaCl, pure wheat starch, or even pure water, and all sorts of other factors like agitation come into play.
    – Aaronut
    Apr 23, 2011 at 16:48

Yes, there are sources. And it looks like we might have caught McGee in an error.

McGee says "Salt in the cooking water not only flavors the noodles, but limits starch gelation and so reduces cooking losses and stickiness". He doesn't give inline citations, but among his sources for the chapter, he lists Barsby, T. et al. Starch: advances in structure and function. I searched this book on Google books for "salt" and it listed some experiments done with potato starch. So if the information that salt limits starch gelation is based on this book, it is valid for potato starch. And among the sources listed in McGee for this chapter, this book seems the most probable source.

On the other hand, there is a paper published by C.J.A.M. Keetels, a, T. van Vliet and P. Walstraa in the Elsevier journal "Food hydrocolloids". The title is Gelation and retrogradation of concentrated starch systems (sorry, paywall). This paper contains the interesting quote:

starch quote

which means that what is true for potato starch is not necessarily true for wheat starch.

I am not 100% sure that McGee is wrong. Maybe somebody came later and proved that there are circumstances where wheat starch is inhibited in gelation too, and McGee is using him as source. Or maybe durum starch is not the same as wheat starch. But until I see such a source, I'll stick with believing the guys who published their own experiments. And their conclusion is that salt water has no effect on wheat starch at all. So no salting necessary. (unless you think that the taste is different, but I'm not completely sure of that, and anyway, you only asked about stickiness).

  • Very interesting find! Does the "However, ..." end in anything that is related?
    – user4697
    Apr 23, 2011 at 8:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.