Although I am by no means a connoisseur (I don't really even drink it) I have been investigating the various means by which wine bottles are stopped up.

This was prompted by a negative reaction by a more dipsomanic friend to a screw top wine that I had purchased from my local off licence. The impression I got from him was that a bottle with a cork was less... tacky. And that somehow a bottle with a screw top gave him the impression of teens in parks drinking Lambrini through straws.

I have read a few articles online here, and here which seem to show some benefits to screw top bottles (namely that they aren't affected by TCA and are easier to open).

I have not been able to find any resources which show an actual benefit to the wine that comes from using cork. The usual pros listed include the fact that it supports natural cork plantations (an ethical consideration) or that it just seems to be more sophisticated.

So, is there any reason (when only considering taste) that cork should be used over a screw top?

  • There have been some very informative answers to this question, and I realised after reading Scivitri's answer that I had made a fundamental error in my initial reasoning. Taste is so intrinsically linked with presentation that I think it's correct to say that cork could improve the taste in certain ways. However TFD's answer is sufficient to determine that there are few purely chemical benefits to cork.
    – Andy F
    Aug 9, 2012 at 7:31
  • klypos's answer has a good handle of the human element. The comparison of the record vs. CD is interesting too. Noticing records are still popular in certain circles, which has nothing to do with science, just to do with culture
    – TFD
    Aug 9, 2012 at 8:24
  • 1
    It's more than that. The suppliers of cork cannot respond to the demand of the vintners, so it is sensible to use screwcap alternatives - but only cork is PROVEN to work for long periods of time, and we have to wait and see for the screwcaps and synthetic corks. That's why the top wine producers are still using corks. OTOH I once took the capsule from a bottle of Chateau Lascombes and found a dead maggot underneath that had crawled out of the cork - you don't get that with screwcaps.
    – klypos
    Aug 10, 2012 at 0:08
  • Deep subject and very polarizing too. My experience with synthetic corks/caps/Tetra boxes have shown no real difference in the quality of the wine to my taste buds. That said, those wines were not of extreme high quality but of the low to mid price range. Producers of this range love the new sealing methods because they have much LESS spoilage as when they used natural cork. Lower cost wine means lower cost cork being used so you get more spoilage from defects in the cork. As far as high end wine goes, I don't dare say a word as I couldn't tell you if the cork makes a difference or not. Aug 10, 2012 at 21:52
  • @klypos depends on you definition of "top wine producer" :-). Anyway, many top wine producers change corks every 25 years as insurance against cork failure. So we could say they are proven to last 25 years, which is less than aluminium screw caps!
    – TFD
    Aug 13, 2012 at 1:53

5 Answers 5


If a wine maker loves their wine, and their customers, they will use screw caps. All the studies have come back positive for screw caps. See screw cap initiative for starters.

Some main points are:

  • Corks taint the wine
  • Corks, real or synthetic, have a very high failure rate. Screw caps are basically 100% effective (maybe too effective)
  • Wine ages better with a screw cap, as there is no chance of seal failure or tainting
  • Screw caps have been physically tested for over 30 years, and are designed to last longer than that
  • You can cellar wine bottles at any angle
  • The energy used in making a recyclable (aluminium) screw cap is significantly less than used in making a cork
  • Most corks aren't made in ethical plantations
  • No special tools are required to open and recap a bottle (cork knives can be a serious health hazard later in the evening).
  • Wines age more safely. Corks do not breathe, but they may shrink and let wine out (bottles stored on side). Good vineyards will re-cork cellared wine every 20 to 25 years, or when corks start failing. The wine is topped up to the correct level, and often the wine/cork gap is flooded with nitrogen to avoid oxygen contamination which will "soften" the wine.

All in all, some pretty convincing reasons to go with screw caps.

  • To you last point, the problem with recapping isn't so much with how to cover the hole, but with oxidation and giving acetobacter a chance to get a foothold.
    – baka
    Aug 6, 2012 at 23:57
  • 1
    Not too many people seem to have the will power not to finish a opened bottle, hence the "yeah right". This could lead to the discussion on why "wine grade" plastic bagged wine keeps better, and has a lower total energy footprint than bottled wine...
    – TFD
    Aug 7, 2012 at 1:20

An oenologist (a wine expert), once told me that for young wines, artificial corks (and probably screw caps) are perfectly alright. Young wines should be consumed within a year or two.

However, for aged wines, he'd stick with natural cork, because cork lets the wine breathe, letting the wine mature further inside the bottle.

The debate around synthetic is due to the fact that synthetic cork completely blocks the air. Some wine experts believe that some air is beneficial to the maturation of the wine.

source: http://www.cellaraiders.com/NaturalCorkSyntheticCorkScrewCaps.php

Edit: The cork bottled wine benefits from a process called 'reductive aging'. According to WineMaker Magazine, some wines need a little extra oxygen that seeps through the cork over a long period of time.

Although cork-stoppered wines intentionally allow for miniscule amounts of oxygen to seep in over a long period of time, amounts beyond this can prevent the proper development of bottle bouquet, and proper varietal aromas can also be obscured or destroyed.

Some wines are more affected by oxygen than others (i.e., wines that are low in acidity, body, tannins, etc. -- those traits that allow a wine to age extensively). A key factor influencing the potential oxidation of a given wine is its pH level. As pH rises (i.e., or as acidity falls), the potential for a wine's oxidation increases. When pH rises the wine's phenols are in a state that fosters their reacting to each other and falling out as sediment and increasing the wine's potential for oxidation. Therefore, wines with a higher pH have lower potential for aging than wines with a lower pH.

According to Wikipedia, the benefits of screw caps in this aspect have yet to be proven.

The advent of alternative wine closures to cork, such as screw caps and synthetic corks have opened up recent discussions on the aging potential of wines sealed with these alternative closures. Currently there are no conclusive results and the topic is the subject of ongoing research.

  • 5
    This is similar in premise to another answer that was deleted; it immediately raises the question, why is some air beneficial, as opposed to harmful? Is there a scientific basis or could it simply be something that traditionalists have latched onto as being different from screw caps and therefore better? There's clearly evidence that some air exposure occurs, but why is that an advantage? The phrase "some wine experts" would definitely be flagged as weasel words on Wikipedia.
    – Aaronut
    Aug 7, 2012 at 0:31
  • @Aaronut this isn't wikipedia, and for a good reason
    – TFD
    Aug 7, 2012 at 9:12
  • @TFD some experts claim your statement makes sense Aug 7, 2012 at 9:41
  • @Aaronut, I've extended the answer. I would have said "most wine experts"... :-) Aug 7, 2012 at 10:32
  • 1
    Some science on this matter nzic.org.nz/CiNZ/articles/Limmer_69_3.pdf while there is a testable difference in some cases, this suggests it's a non issue and that screw caps can be changed anyway if this is all correct
    – TFD
    Aug 8, 2012 at 4:28

This is an awkward question, because food is about so much more than chemical interplay on the tongue, and how molecules decay over time. If all we cared about was getting proper nutrition, we would swallow a handful of pills each day which contained the nutrients we need, washed down with a shake containing bulkier elements like proteins and carbs. If all we cared about was taste, we would construct artificial foods with perfectly synthesized flavor profiles. (I'm guessing we'd wrap our perfect mix of nutrients into beverages, if flavor was the goal. After all, we already do have a host of artificial flavored sodas and such out there.)

But food is about so much more than that. Presentation makes food look engaging. Textures and smells have a huge impact on whether you find a food enjoyable. Wine glasses clink (particularly when toasting) to engage your hearing. The ceremony around uncorking a bottle creates a definite atmosphere which will color your perception of a meal, even down to how dishes taste. So, as easy as it may be to find links to articles about bottle seals and preventing air exchange, that is by no means the sum of the flavor in a bottle of wine. And anyone with experience of different dining environments, who enjoys uncorking a bottle, will find much changed in the flavor by the change from a cork to a screw-top. Yes, it's psychological. But really "flavor" is about how chemical impulses from your senses are interpreted by the brain; all flavor is psychological. And all of your senses work together; it's never about a simple signal from one sense.

Now, all that said, if you are NOT steeped in wine tradition, you likely will enjoy a glass of wine from a screw-top bottle perfectly fine. The fluid will be preserved at least as well, and if the only thing which changed in your meal was the un-corking became an un-screwing, a non-connoisseur probably wouldn't even notice. (Except all your "wine snob" friends will have a new topic for the next 20 minutes.) In wines produced to be consumed within 5-10 years, I highly doubt there is any worthwhile difference between any sealing method. And I doubt any of the wine collectors have allowed screw-top bottles into their collections yet, so we're still hundreds of years shy of long-term storage data.

I'll add that I had heard the common idea that cork is a depleting resource. This is often mentioned as a reason for the shift from corks to other closures in wine. I tried to Google this, and found several discussions (on semi-public forums, so I'll leave research to the reader rather than provide links) about this being a myth, and the shift being caused by a desire to prevent contaminants from getting into wine. So, it seems bottlers feel cork is a poor choice for wine.

  • I realize that you're trying to make a point about presentation, but I think you're off-base in your first paragraph. No combination of pills is going to provide adequate nutrition, and we already have plenty of "artificial foods with perfectly synthesized flavor profiles" (pick up just about anything in the snack food aisle). Presentation certainly does play a role - one which clearly applies to wine - but that is a direct result of prior conditioning and is precisely the issue that the OP was trying to take out of the equation. And it's also why wine tastings are usually blind.
    – Aaronut
    Aug 6, 2012 at 22:30
  • @MissesBrown laugh I wasn't particularly comfortable tacking on my personal opinions, but after several paragraphs, some form of "conclusion" felt proper. But it's easily removed, especially as I don't think it added anything to my answer.
    – Scivitri
    Aug 7, 2012 at 2:26
  • @Aaronut The different perspectives I've seen from people about how wine should be stored, presented, served, etc. lend me to the conclusion there are at least as many viewpoints as there are wine drinkers. It's a massive discussion, which is impossible to distill into a few sparse paragraphs. I wanted to touch on enough of the other perspectives to help readers see some of the broader question. I do believe there is much more to food than the ingredients. I'm not particular to the "cork only" viewpoint, but I know lots of people who are.
    – Scivitri
    Aug 7, 2012 at 2:27
  • Did you even read the question? "So, is there any reason (when only considering taste) that cork should be used over a screw top?"
    – MStodd
    Aug 8, 2012 at 22:55

So there's the science of aging wine, and then there's the neurology and psychology of drinking wine, and wines that we think are more expensive end up affecting our pleasure sensor more. In those cases, they told people what the cost of the wine was (well, lied about the cost).

Presentation matters with food. When people think they're being served something fancier, it affects their perception of it.

So ... if you're going to be serving the wine to someone by the glass, and they don't see you pour, the screw top is superior. If they see you open the bottle, and they're not familiar with the advantages of screw tops, cork is better.

I'm still waiting for someone to make a bottle that's corked + screw top. So you take off the better seal, but can still pull the cork out to impress those people that don't know better.

Oh ... and I should also mention that most people can't tell the difference in blind tastings of wine. If you enjoy your wine, you should do everything in your power to not become a wine connoisseur.


Your critical friend reminds of a scene in an old film where Fred Astaire, an American in Paris, complains that he's searched every local shop for a decent bottle of wine but can only find French stuff ...

Cork is the bark of an oak tree. A lot of the European supply comes from Catalunia, the region that is partly French and partly Spanish south of Perpignan. I've seen them taking the bark off there, they remove a large section around half the trunk, leave the tree alone for thirty years to grow more bark, then they take the other side off. This is not a crop that allows farmers to respond rapidly when demand increases. You have to plant trees for your grandchildren.

Decorative and insulative uses for cork, that were common 40 years ago, have disappeared - cheaper alternatives have been found. They may come back in the future, when new planting allows it. In the same way, the more enlightened wine producers have sought alternative closures for their short life wines, but they are still using corks on the top line wines.

The reason is that corks have a proven history of reliability as a closure, as long as the wine is in contact with the cork. A hundred year lifetime is not uncommon, if you have that much willpower. I have a record of Enrico Caruso that is over a hundred years old, it still plays. I have a CD of Paul Weller that is about twenty years old, but some of that doesn't play. OTOH I can drop a CD and most of the time it won't make a difference.

The demand for bottle closures increases and the cork supply is finite for the forseeable future. There is resistance to change, a lot of snobs don't like wine without a cork, especially in France and Germany where they have been accustomed to corks all their lives.

Cork doesn't improve the taste ...

  • The tree forms a thick, rugged bark containing high levels of suberin. Over time the cork cambium layer of bark can develop considerable thickness and can be harvested every 9 to 12 years to produce cork. source Wikipedia. Aug 6, 2012 at 23:26
  • I'm repeating what I was told, regional variations and customs must apply - it is easy to see that you could take less bark at more frequent intervals, and the tree would grow better. If you like, I'll edit Wikipedia to say that - it is no big deal.
    – klypos
    Aug 7, 2012 at 0:23
  • Have you seen the corks made from crumbs of cork re-constituted. That is what they do when you are desperate for cork material!
    – TFD
    Aug 7, 2012 at 9:17
  • A lot of corks these days are constructed from pieces, especially champagne and sparkling wine corks. Makes you wonder what they use as glue.
    – klypos
    Aug 7, 2012 at 12:28
  • The only part that attempts to answer the question is your last 'sentence' and it's a pretty pathetic answer
    – MStodd
    Aug 8, 2012 at 22:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.