18

I saw a great recipe for Beef Wellington on Serious Eats that I'm eager to try. However, my roommate does not eat mushrooms (both because he dislikes the flavor and because he had a bad experience as a child, so "hidden mushrooms" are out too). I worry that omitting them would defeat most of the purpose of the dish. Is there anything that could be used in their place to give a similar flavor?

Improve this question
4
  • 1
    I am a mushroom hater too--I read Kenji's article--but this is a dish I just wouldn't make. Mushrooms are kind of key to its identity.
    – SAJ14SAJ
    Dec 19, 2012 at 13:54
  • I'm also a mushroom hater; I've scrapped off this part of the wellington for years. To me it's about how the beef cooks wrapped in this way not about the flavor of the layer.
    – vwiggins
    Dec 19, 2012 at 15:24
  • 21
    Awww, don't hate mushrooms. I know one, and he's quite the fun guy!
    – JoeFish
    Dec 19, 2012 at 16:17
  • Butter fried Sinsimella flower paste? Without mushrooms, it's not going to be Beef Wellington. You could put some garlic in there to cover the inevitable chlorophyll taste. -Check the legality in your sate/country before proceeding.
    – Wayfaring Stranger
    Oct 28, 2019 at 0:11

10 Answers 10

Reset to default
12

I don't think you can make a Beef Wellington without the obligatory mushrooms, it essentially becomes something else.

The whole concept behind beef wellington is to keep the meat juices in by being surrounded by pastry but there's no reason why you shouldn't omit the mushrooms for something else. I really can't think of any other food substance that would replicate the flavour of mushrooms without being mushrooms other than truffle.

I would try something like a pork/onion sausage meat stuffing and being the time of year it is, perhaps with chestnuts as a possible alternative, either surrounding the beef or inside it.

Improve this answer
1
  • 5
    Ooh, chestnuts might work! The recipe I linked sends the mushrooms through a food processor anyway.
    – Yamikuronue
    Dec 19, 2012 at 15:05
10

Two years later, the chestnut idea worked swimmingly :D

I followed the recipe I linked in the question, with the following changes:

  1. Obviously, I replaced one pound of mushrooms with one pound of chestnuts. In hindsight, that was probably a bit too much, as a pound of mushrooms would have cooked down significantly more, but we didn't mind.
  2. In step 3, I omitted the horseradish, as I don't like it. I'm only reporting that for accuracy :)
  3. I replaced step 4 entirely with the following: Chop all chestnuts in half, being careful as they have a tendency to fly apart. Boil the halves in a saucepan of water for 7 minutes. Drain and let cool, then peel -- this should now be a much easier task. Chop chestnut meats finely.
    • I should note that I accidentally boiled them too long, and they got a bit crumbly while I was peeling them. That didn't matter, because I was going to chop them. However, in the future I might try using a food processor to chop them, because I ended up with an uneven chop and the larger pieces stood out from the eventual mixture, making it harder to eat.
  4. In step 5, I had to add more butter, as the chestnuts basically absorbed the entire amount of butter called for without actually sauteeing in it. Not that I minded :) I sauteed the chestnuts until soft, then added the shallots and thyme and proceeded as usual.
  5. I omitted the foie gras, again, added only for accuracy. Kenji mentioned in the comments that it's not needed if you don't like it or can't find it, so I omitted to make the whole thing simpler.

The dish turned out utterly delicious :D I don't usually buy beef tenderloin, finding it usually lacking in flavor; since the goal of the dish was to add more interesting flavor and texture back, I definitely feel this was a success. I realized during the rolling step that I hadn't bought the exact right cut, so it kind of fell apart a bit during serving, but despite all the hard work and mistakes I'd definitely make this again.

Improve this answer
9

I hate mushrooms too. The only time I ever made wellington, I simply put a mixture of onions and bacon and cheese in place of the mushroom layer. I first sprinkled parmesan cheese. Then I put a layer of finely chopped sauteed onions and then crumpled cooked bacon. It was fantastic and everyone there said it was the 'best thing they ever ate'. I realize this isn't really 'wellington' anymore. But let's face it. The only real reason anyone wants to eat it is because it's beef and puffed pastry! That's what's most important I think :)

Improve this answer
7

I don't like mushrooms much either, I've made wellingtons with pate mostly, although I've experimented with chopped up brussel sprouts with some success as well. One thing I would like to try is yellow lentils but haven't had the opportunity.

You could still try mushrooms though if it's the texture your roommate doesn't like rather than the flavor. If it is texture then try making a rough paste out of mushroom and shallots rather than chopped up pieces. Or try shitakes instead.

Improve this answer
1
  • 1
    Pate and onion would work well.
    – vwiggins
    Dec 19, 2012 at 15:23
4

My husband also dislikes mushrooms. I substituted them for caramelized onions. Together with the pâté, it turned out quite well, though I agree that substituting the the mushrooms totally changes the character of the dish!

Improve this answer
4

I have used haggis, and it worked a treat! The oats soaked up the juices and kept the pastry dry, and it complemented the beef wonderfully. The only thing I would say is ensure that you only make a thin layer as haggis can have quite a strong taste.

Improve this answer
3

I've used both haggis and black pudding as an alternative to duxelle. Obviously they both change the nature of the dish and is a bit of a faff to prepare (particularly the black pudding) but the combination of flavours is fantastic. As mentioned above, whether haggis or black pudding, it needs to be quite a thin layer so it doesn't completely overpower the beef.

Improve this answer
1
  • I endorse the "thin layer" advice for the Wellington but only for black pudding with rough bits of cooking apple added otherwise the black pudding will fight it out with the pate part of the dish. I venture to suggest that haggis won't work save for upsetting the Scots!
    – Peter Point
    Feb 12, 2017 at 6:02
2

I find olives tend to keep a similar texture to the mushrooms without bringing their disgusting earthy flavor to the dish :)

Improve this answer
2
  • 2
    Olives tend to be as controversial as mushrooms however; that won't work for me either. But maybe someone else can try that one!
    – Yamikuronue
    Oct 18, 2013 at 17:38
  • Ew. Instead of the lovely earthy flavor of mushrooms, you want to put in the disgusting petroleum-like flavor of olives. Ick.
    – Marti
    Nov 8, 2013 at 18:58
1

I have a mushroom allergy so i can't make beef wellington with it. I was thinking about using caramelized onion or garlic and cheese (probably a sharp cheddar or brie) wrapped in bacon or prosciutto.

Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    If you were only thinking about why you post this an answer? You don't even know (yet) if this will be a good substitute.
    – user34961
    Feb 12, 2018 at 12:37
  • 4
    I doubt everyone who suggests substitutions has actually tried them in the specific recipe the OP is asking about; everyone extrapolates from experience. Let's not give someone a hard time just because they used the word "thinking".
    – Cascabel ♦
    Feb 12, 2018 at 16:57
0

Try sun dried tomatoe pesto on layers of thin slice prosciutto then roll on puff pastry for an Italian style Wellington

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.