When bringing water to a boil from cold water, what effect does a lid have on the time to boil? Does it increase or decrease the time? How much? Why?

  • 3
    Use an electric kettle, it is generally much faster and more efficient to bring water to the boil
    – TFD
    Feb 23, 2013 at 5:39
  • Whether it's "more efficient" depends on the relative price of natural gas, given a gas flame being the implied alternative.
    – JDługosz
    Mar 5, 2021 at 16:16
  • How about efficiency from a time perspective? Is it generally faster to boil using an electric kettle? Dec 8, 2021 at 1:01

2 Answers 2


Yes, water does boiler measurably faster with the lid on.

The reason is simple: in order to boil, water must be heated to the boiling point (okay, that was obvious). However, while heat is being introduced at the bottom of the pot, heat is also being lost at the top of the pot, through three means: evaporative cooling, and air convection of heat away from the surface of the water, and radiation from the surface (this last is probably the least significant).

Its like going outside with your hat off--you need to work harder to stay warm, because you are loosing heat faster. Similarly, the flame has to introduce energy to make up for the cooling at the top of the pot.

With the lid on the pot, convective cooling will be substantially curtailed, as cool air will not be able to circulate directly onto the surface of the water to cool it; radiative cooling will be slightly reduced, because heat will have to radiate or convect to the lid, to then radiate from there.

Additionally, with the lid on the pot, the evaporated water cannot diffuse or convect into the room. It will soon reach vapor pressure equilibrium and begin condensing almost as fast as it evaporates, returning much of the latent heat of evaporation as almost as fast as it is lost (it is not a total recovery, because the pot with lid is not air tight).

So the largest of the cooling effects will be curtailed.

The hat is on the pot, as it were :-)

This article at Mind Your Decisions shows actual home experimental measurements. Boiling 16 ounces of water:

The covered pot boiled quicker at 4 minutes and 15 seconds. The uncovered pot took an extra 30 seconds to boil at 4 minutes and 45 seconds.

You will have to decide if the time difference matters to you. It certainly will cut your electric or gas bill a small amount.

It is the reduced cooling--essentially--insulation like a hat, that is the true effect of the lid.

  • 3
    Do not attempt to use hats as alternatives to pot lids. #badchoices
    – logophobe
    Jun 17, 2014 at 18:40

Water evaporates at the top of the pan, taking some of the heat out of the pan. Putting a lid on reduces the amount of evaporation.

For a similar reason, you should put salt into the water when it's already boiling. Salt increases the density of the water, therefore increasing the boiling point (it starts to boil at a higher temperature).

  • 9
    At culinary concentrations, the effect of the salt on the boiling point is negligible.
    – SAJ14SAJ
    Feb 23, 2013 at 12:13
  • @SAJ14SAJ, you're absolutely right, but it's something 'they' say; Add salt after the water starts boiling. Feb 23, 2013 at 16:07
  • 4
    Actually, the reason to add salt after the water's come to a boil is because salt can do some nasty things to pots.
    – Joe
    Mar 18, 2015 at 13:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.