This is a question about the physics of muffins. With a standard size muffin tray, when filled with batter, the heat and expansion causes the dough to spill over the edge and form the classic muffin top. But with smaller and smaller tray sizes the amount of expansion will eventually just be a bump that does not spill over the sides. What is the theoretical minimum muffin size, assuming standard muffin batter (no upping the baking powder). would it be possible to make breakfast-cereal sized muffins?

  • 2
    Okay, I answered this, just for my own amusement, but you have to admit it is a silly question. Why are you asking? :-)
    – SAJ14SAJ
    Sep 30, 2013 at 20:42
  • 2
    BTW, you would have to lower the baking powder, not raise it...
    – SAJ14SAJ
    Sep 30, 2013 at 20:46
  • 1
    @SAJ14SAJ I confess, it is a silly question. Contrary to popular belief, silliness is its own reason. That and a fantasy about creating muffin cereal, which is also very silly. Sep 30, 2013 at 20:47
  • 1
    I imagine almost any of the injection molded cereals like captain crunch, or the marshmallows from the one with the rabbit, could be molded into muffin shapes. But the texture would not be muffin-like.
    – SAJ14SAJ
    Sep 30, 2013 at 20:50
  • 1
    Now we have Zeno's Muffin Paradox...
    – SourDoh
    Oct 4, 2013 at 16:47

1 Answer 1


First, you must assume a spherical muffin. This is a silly but fun question, so lets think about the limiting factors.

What if you could scale down everything (the pan, the size of the ingredients, the size of the gas cells, everything else) uniformly.

If that could be done, muffin tops would be a uniform phenomenon at any size.

So, what can we not scale down uniformly?

It seems to me that there are to major factors that cannot be uniformly scaled down in actual practice:

  1. The cell-size of the starch matrix that is expanded by the leavening. It has a minimum size, and one would imagine that muffins must be macro-scaled compared to the cell size in order to work.

    Since the cell size is visible as the grain in an actual muffin, the muffin has an internal structure on the order of millimeters, typically (I haven't baked muffins just now to measure their structure size) based on my best guess and recollection. This is taking into account some of the larger scale structures within the muffin, like bubbles, and that "grain" which is composed of even finer "grains".

    So one limiting factor would be that the muffin would have to be several orders of magnitude larger than tenths of millimeters, say three orders of magnitude. That would bring the limiting size of muffin-topped muffins to about a centimeter across.

  2. Heat penetration.

    We can assume the rate of cooking in the muffin is proportional to the radius of the muffin at any given size, as a first order approximation, for any given temperature.

    At some point, the muffin will either cook through before it can expand, or burn on the outside before it cooks through.

    The problem with tiny baked goods is that they are outside any effective balance of temperatures. Either they cook through and start drying out without any good crust development, or the outside is overdone before the inside gets cooked.

    The requirement for muffins is even more balanced: it has to heat the inside enough to trigger the oven spring from the leavening before the outside is set enough that it cannot expand, while still being able to cook all the way through, set the outside, and get decent crust development.

    This is very hard to manage.

Practically, it is likely that the current mini-muffin pan size (a couple of centimeters across) is about as small as you can go without having to start taking drastic measures with the recipe. The main problem is heat management: getting good oven spring without the muffin setting too fast, while cooking it through, and yet having nice crust development on the outside.

You can have smaller baked goods, but they have a much simpler structure. They are called cookies. Most muffin batters would make an effective drop cookie, again probably down to about 2 cm. They would be essentially all muffin top.

For a look at some of these practical factors, see:

See also: How to adapt brownie recipe to cook well in a mini-muffin tin?

  • 3
    Mini-muffins indeed don't go over the edges quite as easily, in my experience!
    – Cascabel
    Sep 30, 2013 at 21:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.