I started baking pork chops at about 2pm. 30 mins into cooking I had to leave. I turned off oven and left. It's now 640pm and I'm just getting home. The pan is still slightly warm. Are the pork chops still good to continue cooking?

  • When you say 'slightly warm', would you estimate it as being above 120F? If so, it's quite possible that you have a well-insulated oven, and had sufficient thermal mass that the majority of the 4 hrs of unattended cooking was not in the 'danger zone'.
    – Joe
    Jun 30, 2014 at 17:23

2 Answers 2


Even though you turned the oven off when you left, there was still likely enough residual heat to continue cooking the chops. Rather than a half-cooked chop that sat out for 4 hours, you've got mostly or fully-cooked chops that sat in a warm environment for 2-3 hours. Whether they hit the recommended internal temperature (which is now actually 145F with a 3-minute rest for fresh pork, rather than the 165F quoted in other answers, at least according to the USDA) is anyone's guess.

From a culinary standpoint, since they've been pretty well cooked, baking them back up to that temperature (or more likely to 165F, which is the recommended temp for leftovers) will probably dry them into leathery little pucks. If you're going to risk re-cooking and eating these, I'd recommend a higher-moisture cooking method like braising; chops stand up pretty well to this treatment.

As mentioned in comments, these have been sitting at near-room temperature for longer than is generally considered safe. And without knowing what temperature the interior of the chops reached, it's unknown how safe they would have been even if you returned before they cooled into the dreaded "danger zone". There are a lot of questions here from a safety standpoint. I'll quote another answer here, as I think this says it best:

The safe limit for raw or cooked food is 2 hours in the danger zone (40-140° F or 4.4-60° C).

If you're a restaurant owner or cook, you must follow this rule [...] If you are not working in a professional capacity then you are not legally required to follow it, but if you are serving guests then it would be irresponsible (and possibly actionable, if someone gets sick) to do otherwise.

If you're an individual serving only yourself, then take whatever liberties and break whatever rules you want; it's your food, and your body.

I personally would probably write these off as a loss, but I tend to be fairly risk-averse.

  • 2
    It's not 145° F with a 3-minute rest, it's 145 with a 3-minute hold.
    – Aaronut
    Jun 28, 2014 at 23:25

it's iffy. that pork was sitting in the danger zone(40-140f) for 4 hours, and that's enough time for a LOT of bacteria to grow on it. Still, if you want to chance it, cook the chop to 165F for the best chance of killing any bacteria or microorganisms.

  • 3
    The 165F for pork recommendation is based on the kinds of things that can be in it already, not the kinds of things that might colonize it if you let it sit out.
    – Cascabel
    Jun 28, 2014 at 16:26
  • As Logophobe mentions in his answer, 165F is no longer (as of a few years ago) the pork cooking temp recommendation by the USDA. It's 145F (yay!). But that's neither here nor there, because @jefromi's point is still very valid here. Those cooking temperatures assume proper storage, not "sat around all day in a warm environment uncooked" scenarios.
    – Preston
    Jun 29, 2014 at 20:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.