Let's say I'm in the middle of a 72-hour 135F sous vide recipe, and I want to cook some chicken thighs for dinner for tonight.

Does it make sense to put the chicken in the bath at 135 for my normal chicken sous vide time, then finish them using a conventional cooking method (in the oven or on the stovetop), until the inside is fully cooked?

Alternatively, can I turn my 72-hour short ribs SV bath up to 150F for 1.5 hours to sous vide the chicken simultaneously?

  • The results are in: I cooked the chicken in the same bath as the 72-hour ribs, and they were delicious. The ribs sat for another day, and they too were great.
    – rbp
    Jan 8, 2015 at 15:03

2 Answers 2


You can cook chicken at 135F, or indeed any temperature 131F or up. It will take a while; several hours, as noted in the Baldwin Sous Vide Guide you posted. If you pasteurize it at 135F, you can then later cook it, ignoring the temperature (and only worrying about the texture, etc.), as its already cooked to safety.

If you want to hold it, chill it down quickly, e.g., in an ice bath. Do not remove it from the bag until you're ready to throw it in the oven (to minimize oxidation).

I do not suggest turning your water bath up, as you will end up with well-done shortribs instead of the medium-rare ones you wanted.

  • the chicken is in with the short ribs. we'll see how it goes!
    – rbp
    Jan 6, 2015 at 23:14

I would not do this. While you don't mention an amount of time, the temperature is much lower than what you would need to cook chicken safely. You could easily incubate and multiply harmful bacteria, and while you might kill them off later in the oven...is it worth the risk? Just cook the chicken the traditional way. Here is a good resource for sous vide time and temp: http://www.chefsteps.com/activities/sous-vide-time-and-temperature-guide

  • 2
    that's a cooking guide, not a Pasturization guide. this page has a chicken pasturization table for 134.5F douglasbaldwin.com/sous-vide.html#Table_4.1
    – rbp
    Jan 6, 2015 at 19:06
  • You didn't mention a length of time in your initial question. You've now edited your question with pertinent information (length of time). You also included an alternative. Then you supplied the link above. You appeared to have answered your own question. In the end, personally, I would just cook the chicken traditionally and not mess with my 72 hour cook.
    – moscafj
    Jan 6, 2015 at 19:48
  • 1
    @moscafj If you want rbp to see your comment, you really should put the @ rbp in it. But anyway, chicken can be cooked safely at 135F (or even 131F). So your answer is incorrect.
    – derobert
    Jan 6, 2015 at 20:04
  • @derobert whether or not it could be cook safely was not the original question (before @rbp) edited it (which was after my original response.) The original question was "does it make sense". Not having specified any length of time, my answer was essentially that it would not "make sense." When folks talk sous vide without a cook time, I tend to err on the conservative side.
    – moscafj
    Jan 6, 2015 at 20:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.