I have been told that smoking with fruit wood that has bark on it is poisonous. I also have been told that there is nothing wrong with using 'barked wood'- that it is only a matter of personal taste.

Which is true?

2 Answers 2


It depends on the wood if it is desirable or not to smoke with the bark still on the wood. I have had good results smoking with apple wood bark, but disgusting results with birch (birch bark gave off heavy soot).

Is it poisonous? Well, I am still alive, but that's anecdotal.

  • 4
    Yeah, I'm gonna need some evidence before I'll accept that you are alive.
    – Shog9
    Jun 11, 2015 at 21:07
  • Not an issue that it's an anecdote, but that n = 1. Try it a dozen or so more times on yourself or feed it to a few dozen other people and we can get some good stats.
    – Nick T
    Apr 6, 2021 at 18:18

I have been smoking meats for some time now (the really hard part is keeping the rib-eyes rolled up tight and lit). But seriously, I have yet to be poisoned by any bark from any of the wood I have used, and I have used them all. I have heard that there are some potential carcinogenic issues if you are constantly eating heavily smoked meat, but I do not have any facts to base that on. I think the primary issue with tree bark is that it will typically add a bad flavor to the meat and make it taste much more ashy and sooty (not very technical terms). Also, if you are in a competition, the bark tends to make much more smoke which can throw the look of your meat off when presenting as well.

Overall, I would say it is a best practice not to use the tree bark. However, I cannot say that it is due to specific health risks.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.