My wife and I have noticed that a lot of the drinks or liquids we buy have a measurement of "fl oz".

I was surprised to ascertain that fl oz. is indeed a measure of volume. I might be a little dense here but why the hell do I need the "fl"? Does this provide us with any more information?

Also for "heavier" liquids couldn't fl oz be different from oz? So if a recipe asked for 10 oz of gravy and I have a jar that is 10 fl oz, what if they gravy is 11 oz? Serenity now!

  • 4
    A recipe that actually says "10 oz. gravy" probably actually means fluid ounces. Nov 5 '15 at 18:44
  • 2
    I think it is the volume of 1 ounce of water.
    – paparazzo
    Aug 4 '18 at 19:32

Because a fluid ounce and a dry measure ounce (both volume measurements) are about 20% different, though "dry measures" (other than the measuring scoops and spoons in a USA kitchen) have become far less common as most product is now marketed by weight, not volume.


A US dry quart is 1101 cc, while a US liquid quart is 946.4 cc (and an imperial quart is 1137 cc either way, since they evidently didn't have the bifurcation.)

A fluid ounce (volume) of water weighs about an ounce (weight) - a jar that is 10 fl ounces is a volumetric measure and can weigh whatever it likes - more for mercury (or syrup, for a less toxic and more food example) and less for ethanol. The continued use of fl mostly helps to distinguish volume from weight in current labeling, practically speaking.

  • 4
    Things would be a lot simpler if we could just use the metric system everywhere. Unfortunately, switching to the metric system is surprisingly complicated.
    – mrog
    Nov 5 '15 at 16:38
  • 2
    No duh. Many decades ago we were "prepared for that great coming change" in school, and yet it proceeds (or not) at a snail's pace.
    – Ecnerwal
    Nov 5 '15 at 16:43
  • 8
    The non-fluid ounce (called an "ounce") is not a volume measurement, it is a weight measurement. There are 16 ounces to a pound, and a pound is clearly a weight measurement. The fluid ounce is a volume measurement and is confusingly named. @blankip Outside of the metric system, there are not really good volume measurements to replace the fluid ounce. The metric system is not generally used in the United States, and even if that changed today many recipes would still have fl. oz. written in them. Nov 5 '15 at 18:35
  • 8
    @ToddWilcox Also, let's not forget the oddity that 1 US Pint = 16 US fl.oz, but 1US Pint = 19.2 UK fl.oz... but 1UK Pint = 20 UK fl.oz. Meaning, oddly, that 1UK Pint = 1.2US Pint and 1UK fl.oz = 0.96US fl.oz. Talk about a headache!
    – J...
    Nov 5 '15 at 18:50
  • 2
    The last paragraph is really all this answer needs—"fluid ounce" disambiguates with the unit of mass. All the stuff about "dry measure" (used in agriculture with bulk commodities) is irrelevant and pretty off-base. US measuring cups and spoons are measuring fluid volume, not dry volume. No one uses a "dry ounce" unit of volume.
    – Miles
    Nov 6 '15 at 6:42

As has been discussed in comments:

  • A fluid ounce is a measure of volume.
  • An ounce is a measure of mass or weight.

The exact sizes of these measurements vary by country and by historical period, as can be seen at the links.

The fact that these units have a similar name is due to historical accident, and you'd be better served by not thinking of them as related AT ALL. They simply measure different things.

In a recipe, the word "ounce" is ambiguous. Unless the recipe or source specifies, I would generally assume:

  • An "ounce" of anything liquid or roughly fluid (gravy, sauce, syrup) should usually be measured in a measuring cup by volume (regardless of weight).
  • For dry goods, usually an "ounce" refers to weight, not volume.
  • Recipes for baking sometimes also include weight measurements in addition to volume measurements (e.g., cups); in this case it is generally clear that an "ounce" refers to weight measurement.
  • Professional cookbooks for large quantities sometimes have recipes which are entirely given in weight measurements; again, in the case context should make that clear.

To answer the question about why we use a "fluid ounce" rather than other volume measurements, originally the "fluid ounce" referred to a volume of a specific fluid that weighed an ounce, usually wine, ale, or water. An "ounce" would thus be a different size depending on the substance being measured. A couple centuries ago, both the U.S. and Britain decided to standardize the "fluid ounce" as a volume measurement equivalent in all contexts, regardless of the substance. Britain chose water as its standard; the U.S. chose the old British wine measure as the standard size for its ounce. Regardless, all fluid ounces are now defined as having a particular volume, with no necessary relationship to the density or weight of the material.

Despite the confusion it causes, the name stuck. For some reason it become adopted as a standard volume measure, probably due to its size and standardization. (Pints were too large and potentially inaccurate for labeling consumer goods; drams and minims were useful for pharmacy but were too small for labeling volumes of any size. Intermediate units like tablespoons and cups tended to vary in size historically. And no one seemed to like using the gill outside of alcohol measures.)

More details on use below.

To clarify a previous answer: If the term "dry ounce" occurs (only generally in culinary contexts), it is ambiguous and could refer to:

  • Measuring something as an ounce by weight (1/16th of a pound)
  • Measuring a solid -- usually a powder, finely chopped materials, or a semisolid like butter -- using a fluid ounce volume (1/16th of a liquid pint, equivalent to 2 tablespoons)

Large quantities of dry goods in the U.S. are measured in bushels, pecks, dry quarts, and dry pints (which are about 16.4% larger than liquid pints). A "dry ounce" (as 1/16th of a dry pint) is NOT used as a volume measurement. (They definitely don't exist officially in the U.S., which is the only place that still has "dry measure" volume units.)

There's no reason for it to exist. The dry pint is the smallest official unit of dry goods; the FDA does not acknowledge the possibility of "dry ounces" for food labeling (see regulation 101.105(b)(3)). Anything solid smaller than a dry pint must be measured by weight or using fluid volume measurements. Smaller units in culinary purposes (cups, tablespoons, teaspoons, and yes, fluid ounces) are all liquid volume measurements which are derived from (and equivalent to) the liquid system, not related at all to the dry goods units.

Also, while we're clearing this up, contrary to popular lore, a "pint is NOT a pound the world around," even with water. In the traditional Imperial system, a fluid ounce of water does weigh exactly an avoirdupois ounce. But an Imperial pint is 20 ounces, not 16, so a pint weighs more than a pound (1.25 lbs., actually). In the U.S. customary system, the fluid ounce was defined as 1/128th of a wine gallon. Thus, a fluid ounce of wine should weigh approximately a U.S. ounce. But since water is denser than wine, a fluid ounce of water weighs more than an ounce (by weight); similarly, the U.S. pint of water (16 fluid ounces) weighs more than a pound (about 1.044 lbs.).

For that matter, the other place of confusion occurs with butter, which is assumed to have 16 ounces in a pound, according to the way each stick is generally marked in the U.S. (with 8 tablespoons = 4 (fluid?) ounces). But butter is about 5% less dense than water and 16 fluid ounces of butter can't weigh the same as 16 fluid ounces of water. A pound of butter thus usually contains somewhere around 33-35 tablespoons, despite being marked as containing 32 tablespoons. This discrepancy is usually not significant in culinary practice and also applies approximately to oils. (To add to the confusion, a U.S. tablespoon for labeling purposes is often defined as 15 milliliters, rather than the 14.787 milliliters which actually make up 1/2 of a customary U.S. fluid ounce. A fluid ounce is also therefore defined by the FDA in the U.S. to be 30 milliliters when referring to nutritional information -- see point 9 here.)

Anyhow -- other than for butter/oil and water/wine, though, these sorts of relationships between volume and weight measurements don't hold AT ALL.

In general, I would avoid trying to equate these two units in any meaningful way, since they only relate in very specific cases and only imprecisely even then. A fluid ounce refers to volume (and is related to cups and pints and quarts and gallons and liters); an ounce is a measure of weight (and is related to pounds and kilograms).

For culinary purposes, it's simple:

  • if you're using a cup to measure something, you're measuring volume (fluid) ounces (whether the material is liquid or not)
  • if you're using a scale, you're measuring ounces
  • if you're measuring butter or shortening in a stick, just accept what the package says and don't think too hard about it

Actually a US Tbsp is aprox.14.78 ml, 1 ml of butter weigh 0.959 gr 1 U.S.tbs=0.5 fluid oz then 0.959*14.78*32=454 gr=1 pound=16 fluid oz JF

  • Are you saying the fluid ounce standard is based on butter, not water?
    – Erica
    Dec 1 '18 at 16:30
  • Maybe I'm missing something but I don't understand this at all.
    – Cindy
    Dec 1 '18 at 17:57
  • @Cindy : see cooking.stackexchange.com/a/69023/67
    – Joe
    Dec 1 '18 at 19:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.