In particular, this VARDAGEN Glass Bowl.
It's almost a quarter inch thick, feels heavy and solid, wonder if anyone has tried. Nothing fancy, just boil and soup kind of thing. I figure it's healthier than stainless steel. Thought?
2
-
1The page you link to says 'WARNING - Serious or fatal crashing injuries can occur from furniture tip-over. To prevent this furniture must be permanently fixed to the wall.'. Is your stove close enough to a wall :-)– JeffJun 26, 2016 at 9:29
-
Must be one of those tub-ready toaster ...– WhoeverJun 28, 2016 at 11:56
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
No, you can't.
You should always assume glass is not safe to use on the stovetop. Essentially none of it is, and while there are a very few exceptions, they'll say so explicitly. (For example this set says stovetop-safe in the description.)
That bowl is nothing special, definitely not stovetop-safe - it'd shatter under the thermal stress. If you look carefully on the packaging, you might even find a warning that's not for use on the stovetop.
-
Thanks, you made it crystal clear. I know the Vision, just not a big fan of the color. The only other one explicit for cooking costs $200. Since it's made by MoMA, I wasn't sure if it meant to be artwork or cookware.– WhoeverJun 26, 2016 at 2:23
-
In general, if it doesn't specifically say "stovetop safe", "oven safe", or "broiler safe", it's not safe to use it as anything other than a bowl. Jun 26, 2016 at 4:23
-
1MoMA Art installation: "A Chef who didn't bother reading the labels: The Consequences"– DVKJun 26, 2016 at 13:55
-
Visions is not glass, from what I recall when they were first marketing it (I have some.) Visions is "transparent ceramic."– EcnerwalJun 26, 2016 at 14:18
-
1