I am a new, and newly sleep-deprived, dad. As such, I didn't think twice about taking a big, shiny, stainless steel spoon and sticking it right in a baby bottle sterilizer. ("I want this supplement to be scooped with a sterile instrument!")

Now, a bottle sterilizer consists of a large, sealed, plastic box into which you put a bunch of water. Put it in the microwave, and it's basically an autoclave. I sealed that sucker up and let 'er rip at 1300 watts. I then walked away and down a flight of stairs.

When I came back to my kitchen, everything was fine. The 3-minute microwave cycle was done, and my stainless steel spoon was apparently sterilized. Nothing was on fire, and the microwave seemed as happy as it had been. I, however, was mortified--and puzzled. I've read that only pointy surfaces cause problems in microwaves. But my spoons are fairly pointy, especially at the handle end:

My beautiful, pointy spoon

Right now, I am provisionally chalking this up to God. But I must admit that I don't find my explanation quite thorough enough. Does anyone have a more specific accounting?

  • 4
    Was the spoon completely surrounded by water?
    – Catija
    Commented Mar 22, 2017 at 20:57
  • 4
    Possible duplicate of Why is some metal safe to use in a microwave, but others not?
    – moscafj
    Commented Mar 22, 2017 at 21:00
  • 3
    Catija, the sterilizer is like a steamer: you put water in the bottom and the stuff sits in a basket above it. moscafj, thanks--I did cite that question and I think it's different but related. Commented Mar 22, 2017 at 21:16
  • 25
    This is probably a better post for Physics SE since the correct answer is entirely related to the interaction of the microwaves with the water and the spoon. Microwaves will attenuate strongly in water (that's how it heats up) so the water offers a degree of protection to the spoon inside. The water will also act to dissipate and bleed any charge accumulation on the spoon surface and is otherwise a strong dielectric (so will polarize heavily to suppress surface potential on the metal). Physics SE could give you a much better answer.
    – J...
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 12:31
  • 4
    A note for the comments and flags of "should be on Physics": The SE network policy is to always respect the OP's choice of site. If a question is on topic on the site where it was asked, it does not get migrated, no matter how well it would fit on a different site. Cross posting is also not allowed. The only thing that might still happen is that the OP decides to self-delete the question here and then post anew somewhere else.
    – rumtscho
    Commented Mar 24, 2017 at 23:10

7 Answers 7


Metal has a lot of potential issues in the microwave (electric charge buildup + arcing, and microwave reflection). There are too many variables to make general statements like "such-and-such metal is safe" or "smooth objects are safe" with confidence, hence the sweeping guaranteed-safe blanket advice to not put metal in the microwave.

The reason it didn't cause issues for you is likely the fact that it was insulated in a plastic container (thus preventing arcing to the microwave walls / magnetron) and that you also had some water in there to absorb any excess reflected energy (and maybe electrical energy through physics that I don't understand, but don't quote me on that one).

In fact a cursory search just happened to turn up this paper regarding sterilization of metal objects in a microwave, which mentions:

Arcing back to the magnetron and damage to the microwave oven are prevented by placing a radar absorbent material within the oven and with proper insulation of the item to be sterilized

And you've got both of those things: A radar absorbent material (the water) and the insulation (a perfectly sealed plastic container).

The type and shape of your metal object is probably unrelated to the success of your accidental "experiment".

As an aside: It's worth mentioning that in the case where a microwave oven does catch fire, the NFPA mentions that 17% of those fires involved the housing/casing of the appliance itself as the first item ignited, where the danger is presumably excess energy reflected back to the appliance, rather than arcing (magnified by poor design or older microwaves that didn't have as good of an ability to absorb reflected energy). That's why, for example, the authors of the sterilization paper linked above included a radar-absorbent material, strange and unpredictable reflections off of metal can easily put the microwave under uneven energy loads it wasn't designed to handle (see also thermal runaway).

And of course, there's also issues with defective appliances or design flaws as well, e.g. that old GE spontaneous microwave fire lawsuit. While the causes of those fires aren't really related to the OP's situation, the point is making blanket statements about metals and such is further complicated by the potential for poorly designed or defective appliances.

Also, this answer isn't intended to say "insulation + water = always safe", it's just intended as an explanation for your specific experience. Even "safe" is flexible: A microwave fire doesn't necessarily lead to a kitchen fire or a burned down house or an injury, e.g. I suppose you could call a microwave fire hazard "safe" if you were standing there on the ready with a fire extinguisher and protective clothing.

  • 5
    So it's safe to put metal in the microwave as long as I have a fire extinguisher handy. Got it
    – aebabis
    Commented Mar 24, 2017 at 16:45
  • 4
    @acbabis It's safe and fun, but only if you don't really care about the microwave anymore (or the things you're sticking inside of it). I made plasma using my old microwave, a glass, and a bit of aluminum foil. Fun to watch. Broke the glass, and the microwave. Didn't set fire to anything.
    – aroth
    Commented Mar 25, 2017 at 12:08
  • 1
    'hence the sweeping guaranteed-safe blanket advice to not put metal in the microwave.' This is plain wrong. It is ADVISED to put a spoon in a cup/glass if you heat liquids. Otherwise you risk high level burns when you take the cup out, because the water might explode. see here: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/234042/…
    – Kami Kaze
    Commented Mar 27, 2017 at 9:23
  • 2
    @KamiKaze That advice exists all over the place, and everybody's heard it. It doesn't matter that it's not accurate advice, or that it's not the advice the manual gives, or that other sources give different advice: The point isn't that it's true (the opposite, actually), the point is only that it exists, it's prevalant (hence the OP's question, for example -- their expectation that the spoon would cause a problem had to come from somewhere), and that's why. It's also pretty minor in this answer. Btw, "This is plain wrong" reads unnecessarily aggressive, there are other ways to say that. :O
    – Jason C
    Commented Mar 27, 2017 at 9:34
  • 2
    @KamiKaze you can prevent superheating (the cause of "exploding") by using a wooden chopstick, or other non-metal utensil
    – Erica
    Commented Mar 27, 2017 at 11:25

Spoons (most metal, in fact) are generally not a huge problem in the microwave. My microwave has metal parts...many do. Forks are sometimes a problem due to a build up of charge between the tines, which could result in sparks. As you note, shape can be a factor. The shape of spoons spreads the charge, the pointy edges of forks and narrow tines could allow a build up. It wasn't luck, but it probably should not be normal practice.

  • 9
    I would be willing to bet that the fact that it was insulated in a plastic container and to some extent the water was the primary factor here, at least for preventing arcing to the microwave walls. For example, the reason they insulate metal equipment when sterilizing it in a microwave (with water serving as the microwave-absorbant material). Also "generally not a problem" is not entirely.... accurate.
    – Jason C
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 8:00
  • I also recall a case of a burger wrapper causing a microwave oven to be damaged, and drip plastic onto the food. Early ovens were more troublesome; modern ones are safer.
    – JDługosz
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 9:13
  • 2
    Shape may not be a factor as well. My brother once covered a plate with a pan's metallic cover, which was perfectly "round" - no spikes or whatsoever - . Well, the microwave was, after some seconds, VERY nasty to look inside, with sparkles and flashes happening. DO NOT EVER do that again! Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 10:57
  • 2
    The fact that the oven contains metal doesn't mean other metal is safe. The metal of the oven itself will be shaped and positioned so as to not do harm. The oven gets harmed from arcing or from reflecting too much energy back into the generator, not from metal per se. Commented Mar 25, 2017 at 5:42

There are actually two things worth considering with metal in microwaves.

The big danger is arcing and that happens with pointy things like forks and apparently grapes. It's also worth considering, being in a plastic box, there was nowhere for the spark to jump to. With a fork there's a small enough spark gap for current to jump. With a spoon, there is not.

However, metal also has a shielding effect, and the USDA even says it's safe to use small quantities of foil in a microwave. In this specific case, there wasn't really enough potential to cause a spark; the shielding just redirected microwaves elsewhere.

  • 4
    Grapes in a microwave are amazing. Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 20:41
  • I wouldn't mess around with putting foil in the microwave. When I was a kid, my friend and I blew out the light in his parent's microwave with a single twist tie like what comes with garbage bags. It was exciting.
    – JimmyJames
    Commented Mar 24, 2017 at 14:23
  • 1
    A twist tie has sharp points. If you don't get the physics, don't try this please. Commented Mar 24, 2017 at 14:24
  • @JourneymanGeek I get the physics. It's just that even in the link you point to, it has 6 caveats and then says "If you see arcing (sparks), immediately remove the foil shielding." Your microwave may already be damaged. It's very hard to predict whether it will arc. Unless you are a physicist or engineer in a relevant field, it's not worth it unless you are prepared to pay for fixing your micro or getting a new one.
    – JimmyJames
    Commented Mar 24, 2017 at 14:27
  • In this case though, you have a smooth piece of metal with no points, away from anything metal, which is why it didn't spark. Commented Mar 24, 2017 at 14:30

In order to reliably set your kitchen on fire, make sure there is enough fuel available, and that some of its mass is either brought to its autoignition temperature, OR vaporized and heated to its flash point, then ignited. While electrical arcs of any kind reach tremendous internal temperatures, they are notoriously bad at heat transfer to surrounding materials.

Something that doesn't belong in a microwave can be heated in more or less three ways:

  • By being a lossy material, absorbing radiation and heating up. Food gets heated that way.
  • By being an effective dipole antenna with a resistive load attached - very dependent on object geometry; a 2-3 inch strip of tinfoil is a good example.
  • By arcing
  • 2
    +1 This is the only response that addresses the inability of the OP to set their kitchen on fire!
    – TripeHound
    Commented Mar 27, 2017 at 11:49

It didn't set your kitchen on fire because while it evidently arced, it was inside a metal box and it didn't have suitable/favorable conditions for igniting what little fuel it had available.

You have a plastic box on one hand, as fuel, and you have water, steam, a metal spoon and a metal microwave oven interior, all noncomustible.) So when the electricity stopped and the arcs stopped, flame was not sustained.

Personally, unless I'm destroying a CD/DVD and/or making "art" from it, by briefly (while watching) zapping it on top of a mug of water, I respect the "no metal in the microwave" rule - it's simpler.

  • 13
    I'm probably missing something, but why do you say it evidently arced? I can't find any indication of that.
    – Cascabel
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 3:05
  • 2
    @Jefromi It's not the greatest picture, but I see what appears to be a blackened spoon (that's possibly only an artifact of the picture location, I guess), and at full-scale view I see pitting along the edges.
    – Ecnerwal
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 13:06
  • 3
    I see, could be. To me it just looked like a dark photo and a banged up old spoon.
    – Cascabel
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 14:07
  • 1
    I've done the microwaving-a-CD thing a few times, and in my experience if you put any water in there with the CD, the water absorbs all the microwave energy and the CD is unaffected.
    – zwol
    Commented Mar 23, 2017 at 18:39
  • 1
    Sorry for bad photo. Spoon is not blackened or banged up; it came in that shape. It's possible that the edge is pitted. Commented Mar 24, 2017 at 6:50

I recently did an "experiment" with tin foil:

Putting just one piece into the microwave did basically nothing, but having two pieces together created sparks between them and burned them away.

Your spoon might just be too massive to reach enough temperature. Metal is usually a good thermal conductor. So a lot of the created thermal energy might just be distributed evenly inside the spoon. It takes a lot of energy to melt or burn iron. Its melting point is at 1811 K ​(1538 °C, ​2800 °F)

I doubt a common household microwave can emit enough energy in form of radiation to heat up the spoon to that level.

Even wood and plastic (some of the more common materials used in kitchens) need several hundred degrees to start burning. If we are talking about surfaces made of stone, then we basically have to create a volcano to melt it.

Long story short: a common microwave is just not powerful enough to burn a kitchen. With some manipulations you might be able to cook water outside of it, but that's all. (Not that I support that kind of experiment.)

  • 2
    It takes about 30 kJ to melt an entire spoon (a typical 25g stainless steel spoon), about half of which is bringing it up to its melting point. Magnetron efficiencies vary, but even at a low-end efficiency of 60%, a 1300-watt microwave would take 38 seconds to melt the entire spoon. So there was definitely enough power to melt the spoon. But the water probably absorbed almost all of the microwaves in this case.
    – Charles
    Commented Mar 24, 2017 at 14:27
  • Understand that the way radio waves of a certain wavelength interact with objects is extremely dependent on the shape and size of the object. Real life antennas don't come in odd shapes because they are modern art. Commented Mar 27, 2017 at 12:19
  • ...And a 1300W heat source is plenty enough to set something on fire. A 13W soldering iron can. Commented Mar 27, 2017 at 12:21

Microwave ovens are made out of steel. There is no danger of putting any metal of any kind (steel, copper, aluminum, etc.) in a microwave PROVIDED IT IS NOT VERY THIN. Foil is much too thin, and even much thicker, but still thin metal like the trim on the glass lid of a rice cooker is too thin. When microwave EMR is directed at thin metals, the waves reflect back and forth quickly between the top and bottom surface, and the metal quickly both overheats and generates a strong static electric charge, creating a fire hazard. For most intents and purposes, the rule is 'no foil in the microwave,' not 'no metal.' However, as I said, I have seen the thin metals used as trim (but not bonded to a thicker layer of metal) cause trouble as well.

  • 2
    Can you give some sources for your information? It looks pretty interesting, but your answer would be better with some references. I had not heard that thickness is the primary factor.
    – Megha
    Commented Mar 26, 2017 at 6:00
  • Thin metal will heat up like hell because a) there is little solid mass to absorb the heat, b) resistive heating if you get a dipole effect is intense, and both can lead to c) some of the metal vaporizing and building a plasma. Reflection can happen with thick metal just as well, and that is what can blow the magnetron if it happens at the wrong angle. The case is made of steel because reflection is exactly what you want - but in an engineered and controlled pattern.... static electricity, and intra-conductor reflections have not much to do with it. Commented Mar 27, 2017 at 12:14
  • 1
    Had to downvote because it can be read as "you're safe with thick metal in a microwave every time" which is dangerous advice - especially in the framework of "you're safe if..." and not "there will be trouble if..." Commented Mar 27, 2017 at 12:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.