Google fails me.

I'm curious how many calories are burned away when you cook various kinds of alcohol...wines, liquors, beers (including lite beer).

3 Answers 3


It depends on how much alcohol there is relative to other things--sugars primarily, as they are about the only calorific part of most alcoholic beverages once the alcohol is gone (alcohol is the most calorific part for sure). You can use the alcohol proportion by volume (ABV) to approximate a little.

Assuming equal amounts of each:

Spirits don't leave much calorific stuff behind at all after the alcohol is gone because they're mostly alcohol. Alcohol by volume is between 40 and 60 percent in most cases.

Wine leaves a bit more, as there is more unfermented sugar remaining in the beverage you buy, but there's still not a heck of a lot. It depends on how dry the wine is. Alcohol by volume is between 10 and 20 percent mostly.

Beer can leave quite a bit, as many have significant amounts of unfermented/unfermentable sugar. This can be where ABV lets you down for estimating--high alcohol beers are also often high in unfermentable sugar too, so when the alcohol goes you're still left with quite a few calories. ABV can be anything from 4 to 20 percent, with the majority clustering around 5 percent. Lite beers are usually pretty low in alcohol and also pretty dry, meaning low residual sugars too.

A gray area is liqueurs and the like. Many are fairly high in alcohol by volume, but also heavy on sugars.

I should also point out that in many cooking applications, the calories added by the alcoholic beverage are fairly negligible, given the small amounts used relative to the number of servings. Even a Boeuf Bourguignon or Coq au Vin with a whole bottle of wine in it doesn't have all THAT much wine per serving--that whole bottle gets broken down into 6 or more servings, so each person gets less than a glass worth of alcohol-free wine calories. That probably averages something like 40 extra calories per serving.

  • 7
    You're assuming the alcohol magically disappears from the food. It doesn't. When you bring a pot of water to a boil, it doesn't all immediately turn to water vapor. Same with cooking alcohol: some of it evaporates, yes, but not all of it. To get all of it to evaporate, you'd need to do the equivalent of boiling the pot dry.
    – Marti
    Commented Dec 10, 2010 at 17:16
  • 2
    That's fine, and I get that--see my participation in the other answer. I still think the basic content here is sound, because I'm explaining how different types of alcoholic beverages behave. And also making the point that in general practice the calories from alcohol are minimal in any case. If people want to do the math, I'd recommend MFG's answer over mine.
    – bikeboy389
    Commented Dec 10, 2010 at 20:44

Not all of the alcohol is burned off as you cook. I wish I could find the reference, but I remember reading that the alcohol volume levels off at about 5% no matter how long you cook it. The key is to reduce the total to a minuscule amount, or add a water-based liquid after boiling it down.

Alcohol is 7 Calories per gram, which is higher than carbs but less than fat.

  • I'd like to see that reference. That number would suggest that if you cook with the average domestic beer (4-4.5 percent), no alcohol at all would cook off. That seems unlikely to me. I'm open to persuasion, though.
    – bikeboy389
    Commented Dec 10, 2010 at 4:53
  • 1
    I found a reference: ochef.com/165.htm This states that at 2.5 hours of cooking 5% of the INITIAL AMOUNT of alcohol is left. So that means that if we started with 100% alcohol, we'd be down to 5% at the end of 2.5 hours. So if you had a recipe with 100 ml of 10% ABV wine, after 2.5 hours you'd have half a milliliter of alcohol (100 ml @ 10% = 10 ml alcohol. 5% of that is .5 ml). Definitely negligible from a calorie standpoint.
    – bikeboy389
    Commented Dec 10, 2010 at 4:59
  • 1
    @bikeboy389: There's a question asking specifically about alcohol cooking away.). I'm fairly certain that it's more complex than the table you found (also linked from that other question): the fraction left probably depends on the initial percentage. Those references make no mention of the initial concentration. (There's some statistical mechanics going on there, but the upshot is that mixtures do not behave intuitively with respect to phase changes.)
    – Cascabel
    Commented Dec 10, 2010 at 7:04
  • I seems right as there is always some Ethanol burn in the mouth after a flame off or a slow cook (I notice it as I don't normally drink Ethanol based drinks)
    – TFD
    Commented Dec 10, 2010 at 10:35

Here is a link to a distiller's page regarding boiling off during the distilling process. He also has a calculation page for plugging in your specific variables (ie. ABV, etc).

If you take for granted the Alcohol being 7cal/g, and use a formula like [100% - ABV% = [CBV%]], the CBV% (non-volatile caloric percent) can yield the calories you're stuck with (probably). This would be found with something like [ABV%*7cal/g = Acal]; then Tcal (total calories by volume) - Acal (alcohol calories) = remaining calories in less volatile components (fats being less able to be boiled off than alcohol).

My math may be fuzzy and the formula may need re-worked, but basically you solve for (volatile) alcohol calories that will burn off (based on time cooked, using the O Chef graph or the distillery calculator), and then subtract them from the stable calories less likely to be cooked off.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.