Skip to main content
added 105 characters in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3

I have completed several government retail scale interface certifications. Any weighing scale that is certified for commercial use has to show the data cannot easily be tampered with. For this reason it would not be possibledifficult to certify a scale with a network or wireless connection. Hence they are all serial interfaces, usually RS-232 or RS-485. In theory a USB interface would achieve the same level of trust, but given the added complication during certification of driver support for a wide variety of connected hardware, i doubt any manufacturer would bother. If you really need network capability, your best bet is a RS232-to-virtualCOM-over-ethernet adapter.

** UPDATE 2023/06/08 ** Just checked and the major manufacturers latest models now offer USB options.

I have completed several government retail scale interface certifications. Any weighing scale that is certified for commercial use has to show the data cannot easily be tampered with. For this reason it would not be possible to certify a scale with a network or wireless connection. Hence they are all serial interfaces, usually RS-232 or RS-485. In theory a USB interface would achieve the same level of trust, but given the added complication during certification of driver support for a wide variety of connected hardware, i doubt any manufacturer would bother. If you really need network capability, your best bet is a RS232-to-virtualCOM-over-ethernet adapter.

I have completed several government retail scale interface certifications. Any weighing scale that is certified for commercial use has to show the data cannot easily be tampered with. For this reason it would be difficult to certify a scale with a network or wireless connection. Hence they are all serial interfaces, usually RS-232 or RS-485. In theory a USB interface would achieve the same level of trust, but given the added complication during certification of driver support for a wide variety of connected hardware, i doubt any manufacturer would bother. If you really need network capability, your best bet is a RS232-to-virtualCOM-over-ethernet adapter.

** UPDATE 2023/06/08 ** Just checked and the major manufacturers latest models now offer USB options.

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3

I have completed several government retail scale interface certifications. Any weighing scale that is certified for commercial use has to show the data cannot easily be tampered with. For this reason it would not be possible to certify a scale with a network or wireless connection. Hence they are all serial interfaces, usually RS-232 or RS-485. In theory a USB interface would achieve the same level of trust, but given the added complication during certification of driver support for a wide variety of connected hardware, i doubt any manufacturer would bother. If you really need network capability, your best best bet is a RS232-to-virtualCOM-over-ethernet adapter.

I have completed several government retail scale interface certifications. Any weighing scale that is certified for commercial use has to show the data cannot easily be tampered with. For this reason it would not be possible to certify a scale with a network or wireless connection. Hence they are all serial interfaces, usually RS-232 or RS-485. In theory a USB interface would achieve the same level of trust, but given the added complication during certification of driver support for a wide variety of connected hardware, i doubt any manufacturer would bother. If you really need network capability, your best best is a RS232-to-virtualCOM-over-ethernet adapter.

I have completed several government retail scale interface certifications. Any weighing scale that is certified for commercial use has to show the data cannot easily be tampered with. For this reason it would not be possible to certify a scale with a network or wireless connection. Hence they are all serial interfaces, usually RS-232 or RS-485. In theory a USB interface would achieve the same level of trust, but given the added complication during certification of driver support for a wide variety of connected hardware, i doubt any manufacturer would bother. If you really need network capability, your best bet is a RS232-to-virtualCOM-over-ethernet adapter.

added 102 characters in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3

I have completed several government retail scale interface certifications. Any weighing scale that is certified for commercial use has to show the data cannot easily be tampered with. For this reason it would not be possible to certify a scale with a network or wireless connection. Hence they are all serial interfaces, usually RS-232 or RS-485. In theory a USB interface would achieve the same level of trust, but given the added complication during certification of driver support for a wide variety of connected hardware, i doubt any manufacturer would bother. If you really need network capability, your best best is a RS232-to-virtualCOM-over-ethernet adapter.

I have completed several government retail scale interface certifications. Any weighing scale that is certified for commercial use has to show the data cannot easily be tampered with. For this reason it would not be possible to certify a scale with a network or wireless connection. Hence they are all serial interfaces, usually RS-232 or RS-485. In theory a USB interface would achieve the same level of trust, but given the added complication during certification of driver support for a wide variety of connected hardware, i doubt any manufacturer would bother.

I have completed several government retail scale interface certifications. Any weighing scale that is certified for commercial use has to show the data cannot easily be tampered with. For this reason it would not be possible to certify a scale with a network or wireless connection. Hence they are all serial interfaces, usually RS-232 or RS-485. In theory a USB interface would achieve the same level of trust, but given the added complication during certification of driver support for a wide variety of connected hardware, i doubt any manufacturer would bother. If you really need network capability, your best best is a RS232-to-virtualCOM-over-ethernet adapter.

added 108 characters in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3
Loading
deleted 55 characters in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3
Loading
added 26 characters in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3
Loading
added 7 characters in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3
Loading
added 68 characters in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3
Loading
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3
Loading
added 7 characters in body
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3
Loading
Source Link
Barny
  • 31
  • 3
Loading