Skip to main content
replaced http://cooking.stackexchange.com/ with https://cooking.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

That price is absolutely ridiculous, and there is no way the frying pans are worth it. To Americans: that's $250 for 2 frying pans! Even All-Clad retails for $100 for a frying pan, and it is among the most expensive cookware. Now, in this case, many people can justify that price for All-Clad, because they heat fast and evenly and will last for several lifetimes with proper care.

While the Fissler pans may be well-made, I would have a very hard time justifying that kind of money. In particular, the Protect model is nonstick, and nonstick surfaces wear out. There is no way around this. The better ones will last longer, but still you get a couple years of good use before the surface degrades. You're far better off buying a series of cheap restaurant-supply nonstick pans, and replacing them regularly. I can find decent ones for about $20-25, which means you can get one for probably €20. See my answer to What is a good brand for teflon pans?What is a good brand for teflon pans? for where to get the best value... and why you shouldn't be spending big money on teflon-coated stuff.

I do not feel the "crispy" model is a safe buy, because it emphasizes a gimmicky crisping surface over versatile everyday use. It also does not describe what, if any, sort of copper/aluminum core it uses to ensure fast, even heating. For a pan at this price range, I would expect a multi-ply construction, with aluminum or copper core. To my mind, this does not bespeak money well spent. At a lower price, it might be an entertaining gimmick, but for that much money you will want a solid, versatile all-around pan.

In fact, with good deals, you could fully equip a kitchen with cookware for that price. I have a 7-piece multi-ply set that I'm quite happy with, and it only cost about $160. Throw in a cheap nonstick pan and a cast-iron skillet, and you're set.

That price is absolutely ridiculous, and there is no way the frying pans are worth it. To Americans: that's $250 for 2 frying pans! Even All-Clad retails for $100 for a frying pan, and it is among the most expensive cookware. Now, in this case, many people can justify that price for All-Clad, because they heat fast and evenly and will last for several lifetimes with proper care.

While the Fissler pans may be well-made, I would have a very hard time justifying that kind of money. In particular, the Protect model is nonstick, and nonstick surfaces wear out. There is no way around this. The better ones will last longer, but still you get a couple years of good use before the surface degrades. You're far better off buying a series of cheap restaurant-supply nonstick pans, and replacing them regularly. I can find decent ones for about $20-25, which means you can get one for probably €20. See my answer to What is a good brand for teflon pans? for where to get the best value... and why you shouldn't be spending big money on teflon-coated stuff.

I do not feel the "crispy" model is a safe buy, because it emphasizes a gimmicky crisping surface over versatile everyday use. It also does not describe what, if any, sort of copper/aluminum core it uses to ensure fast, even heating. For a pan at this price range, I would expect a multi-ply construction, with aluminum or copper core. To my mind, this does not bespeak money well spent. At a lower price, it might be an entertaining gimmick, but for that much money you will want a solid, versatile all-around pan.

In fact, with good deals, you could fully equip a kitchen with cookware for that price. I have a 7-piece multi-ply set that I'm quite happy with, and it only cost about $160. Throw in a cheap nonstick pan and a cast-iron skillet, and you're set.

That price is absolutely ridiculous, and there is no way the frying pans are worth it. To Americans: that's $250 for 2 frying pans! Even All-Clad retails for $100 for a frying pan, and it is among the most expensive cookware. Now, in this case, many people can justify that price for All-Clad, because they heat fast and evenly and will last for several lifetimes with proper care.

While the Fissler pans may be well-made, I would have a very hard time justifying that kind of money. In particular, the Protect model is nonstick, and nonstick surfaces wear out. There is no way around this. The better ones will last longer, but still you get a couple years of good use before the surface degrades. You're far better off buying a series of cheap restaurant-supply nonstick pans, and replacing them regularly. I can find decent ones for about $20-25, which means you can get one for probably €20. See my answer to What is a good brand for teflon pans? for where to get the best value... and why you shouldn't be spending big money on teflon-coated stuff.

I do not feel the "crispy" model is a safe buy, because it emphasizes a gimmicky crisping surface over versatile everyday use. It also does not describe what, if any, sort of copper/aluminum core it uses to ensure fast, even heating. For a pan at this price range, I would expect a multi-ply construction, with aluminum or copper core. To my mind, this does not bespeak money well spent. At a lower price, it might be an entertaining gimmick, but for that much money you will want a solid, versatile all-around pan.

In fact, with good deals, you could fully equip a kitchen with cookware for that price. I have a 7-piece multi-ply set that I'm quite happy with, and it only cost about $160. Throw in a cheap nonstick pan and a cast-iron skillet, and you're set.

total rewrite
Source Link
BobMcGee
  • 18k
  • 4
  • 65
  • 98

That price is absolutely ridiculous, and there is no way the frying pans are worth it. To Americans: that's $250 for 2 frying pans! Even Even All-Clad retails for $100 for a frying pan, and it is among the most expensive cookware. Granted Now, in this case, many people feelcan justify that price for All-Clad is worth that money, but that's because they have a reputation for even heatingheat fast and lifelong durability. Asevenly and will last for several lifetimes with proper care.

While the Fisslers, they seem reasonablyFissler pans may be well made-made, butI would have a very hard time justifying that kind of money. In particular, the primary selling point for these two pansProtect model is their gimmicksnonstick, and nonstick surfaces wear out. When the alternative There is top-notch clad or even Mauviel copper cookwareno way around this. The better ones will last longer, but still you get a gimmick comes off looking shabbycouple years of good use before the surface degrades.

I wouldn't spend more than $50 You're far better off buying a series of cheap restaurant-supply nonstick pans, and replacing them regularly. I can find decent ones for ANY teflon nonstick frying panabout $20-25, because they will always wear out over a few yearswhich means you can get one for probably €20. See my answer to What is a good brand for teflon pans? for where to get the best value... and why you shouldn't be spending big money on teflon-coated stuff. Even hard-anodized pans

I do not feel the "crispy" model is a safe buy, because it emphasizes a gimmicky crisping surface over versatile everyday use. It also does not describe what, if any, sort of copper/aluminum core it uses to ensure fast, even heating. For a pan at this price range, I would beexpect a tough sellmulti-ply construction, with aluminum or copper core. To my mind, this does not bespeak money well spent. At a lower price, it might be an entertaining gimmick, but for me at that price pointmuch money you will want a solid, versatile all-around pan.

In fact, with good deals, you could probably fully equipyou could fully equip a kitchen with cookware for that price. I have a home kitchen with cookware for7-piece multi-ply set that priceI'm quite happy with, and it only cost about $160. Throw in a cheap nonstick pan and a cast-iron skillet, and you're set.

That price is absolutely ridiculous, and there is no way the frying pans are worth it. To Americans: that's $250 for 2 frying pans! Even All-Clad retails for $100 for a frying pan, and it is among the most expensive cookware. Granted, many people feel that All-Clad is worth that money, but that's because they have a reputation for even heating and lifelong durability. As for the Fisslers, they seem reasonably well made, but the primary selling point for these two pans is their gimmicks. When the alternative is top-notch clad or even Mauviel copper cookware, a gimmick comes off looking shabby.

I wouldn't spend more than $50 for ANY teflon nonstick frying pan, because they will always wear out over a few years. See my answer to What is a good brand for teflon pans? for where to get the best value... and why you shouldn't be spending big money on teflon-coated stuff. Even hard-anodized pans would be a tough sell for me at that price point.

In fact, with good deals, you could probably fully equip a home kitchen with cookware for that price.

That price is absolutely ridiculous, and there is no way the frying pans are worth it. To Americans: that's $250 for 2 frying pans! Even All-Clad retails for $100 for a frying pan, and it is among the most expensive cookware. Now, in this case, many people can justify that price for All-Clad, because they heat fast and evenly and will last for several lifetimes with proper care.

While the Fissler pans may be well-made, I would have a very hard time justifying that kind of money. In particular, the Protect model is nonstick, and nonstick surfaces wear out. There is no way around this. The better ones will last longer, but still you get a couple years of good use before the surface degrades. You're far better off buying a series of cheap restaurant-supply nonstick pans, and replacing them regularly. I can find decent ones for about $20-25, which means you can get one for probably €20. See my answer to What is a good brand for teflon pans? for where to get the best value... and why you shouldn't be spending big money on teflon-coated stuff.

I do not feel the "crispy" model is a safe buy, because it emphasizes a gimmicky crisping surface over versatile everyday use. It also does not describe what, if any, sort of copper/aluminum core it uses to ensure fast, even heating. For a pan at this price range, I would expect a multi-ply construction, with aluminum or copper core. To my mind, this does not bespeak money well spent. At a lower price, it might be an entertaining gimmick, but for that much money you will want a solid, versatile all-around pan.

In fact, with good deals, you could fully equip a kitchen with cookware for that price. I have a 7-piece multi-ply set that I'm quite happy with, and it only cost about $160. Throw in a cheap nonstick pan and a cast-iron skillet, and you're set.

pans wear out
Source Link
BobMcGee
  • 18k
  • 4
  • 65
  • 98

That price is absolutely ridiculous, and there is no way the frying pans are worth it. To Americans: that's $250 for 2 frying pans! Even All-Clad retails for $100 for a frying pan, and it is among the most expensive cookware. Granted, many people feel that All-Clad is worth that money, but that's because they have a reputation for even heating and lifelong durability. As for the Fisslers, they seem reasonably well made, but the primary selling point for these two pans is their gimmicks. When the alternative is top-notch clad or even Mauviel copper cookware, a gimmick comes off looking shabby.

I wouldn't spend more than $50 for ANY teflon nonstick frying pan, because they will always wear out over a few years. See my answer to What is a good brand for teflon pans? for where to get the best value... and why you shouldn't be spending big money on teflon-coated stuff. Even hard-anodized pans would be a tough sell for me at that price point.

In fact, with good deals, you could probably fully equip a home kitchen with cookware for that price.

That price is absolutely ridiculous, and there is no way the frying pans are worth it. To Americans: that's $250 for 2 frying pans! Even All-Clad retails for $100 for a frying pan, and it is among the most expensive cookware. Granted, many people feel that All-Clad is worth that money, but that's because they have a reputation for even heating and lifelong durability. As for the Fisslers, they seem reasonably well made, but the primary selling point for these two pans is their gimmicks. When the alternative is top-notch clad or even Mauviel copper cookware, a gimmick comes off looking shabby.

I wouldn't spend more than $50 for ANY teflon nonstick frying pan. See my answer to What is a good brand for teflon pans? for where to get the best value... and why you shouldn't be spending big money on teflon-coated stuff. Even hard-anodized pans would be a tough sell for me at that price point.

In fact, with good deals, you could probably fully equip a home kitchen with cookware for that price.

That price is absolutely ridiculous, and there is no way the frying pans are worth it. To Americans: that's $250 for 2 frying pans! Even All-Clad retails for $100 for a frying pan, and it is among the most expensive cookware. Granted, many people feel that All-Clad is worth that money, but that's because they have a reputation for even heating and lifelong durability. As for the Fisslers, they seem reasonably well made, but the primary selling point for these two pans is their gimmicks. When the alternative is top-notch clad or even Mauviel copper cookware, a gimmick comes off looking shabby.

I wouldn't spend more than $50 for ANY teflon nonstick frying pan, because they will always wear out over a few years. See my answer to What is a good brand for teflon pans? for where to get the best value... and why you shouldn't be spending big money on teflon-coated stuff. Even hard-anodized pans would be a tough sell for me at that price point.

In fact, with good deals, you could probably fully equip a home kitchen with cookware for that price.

cleaner writing
Source Link
BobMcGee
  • 18k
  • 4
  • 65
  • 98
Loading
rewording sentences, small stuff
Source Link
BobMcGee
  • 18k
  • 4
  • 65
  • 98
Loading
Source Link
BobMcGee
  • 18k
  • 4
  • 65
  • 98
Loading