Timeline for Time vs. Temperature - What changes what?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 19, 2021 at 17:30 | comment | added | Vik78 | Your first “Gaussian” chart doesn’t make sense. I think the independent variable should be time cooked (at a fixed temperature), not temperature. | |
Jan 15, 2018 at 16:48 | comment | added | Ian Dunn | Upvote for the conclusion, and the amount of time and effort it obviously took to research & write such a thorough answer. Outside of the conclusion, though, I found the rest of it is somewhat difficult to wade. I think the answer might be more accessible and useful to the average person if the order were flipped. Give the conclusion first, since it's most appropriate for 90% of readers; then, give the detailed answer for those who wish to continue reading. | |
Mar 9, 2017 at 17:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://i.stack.imgur.com/ with https://i.stack.imgur.com/
|
|
Jan 14, 2017 at 23:26 | comment | added | verbose | I'm a bit confused by the second chart. It suggests that actin denatures before myosin, but the text says the opposite. Am I reading the chart wrong? | |
Jan 22, 2014 at 23:08 | history | edited | rumtscho♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added a paragraph with example numbers
|
Jan 22, 2014 at 22:26 | history | answered | rumtscho♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |