I know that you're supposed to cook cuts like beef chuck at a low temperature until they reach a high enough internal temp for the collagen to melt, which is why the same method wouldn't work for steak cuts that lack that collagen.

But why the low temp part? If the goal is to melt collagen, couldn't that be done just as easily at a higher temp?

Also: if there's something special about cooking the meat at a higher temp, regardless of the internal temp it ends up at, does that mean that you have to be careful when searing the meat before braising?

I had always thought that the toughness of a piece of meat depended on its internal temp, but it seems like a 200F braised chuck would taste different from a 200F skilled-fried overcooked chuck steak.

  • The top answer here answers this indirectly..."The higher the heat the more the meat is contracted and it will get dryer, in a stew that might not be as obvious as in other cooking methods but it should still be the fact." – Catija Sep 13 '15 at 2:58

If the goal is to melt collagen, couldn't that be done just as easily at a higher temp?

No, it won't be.

The reaction which has to happen to the collagen doesn't go quicker when the temperature is higher. You have to get it to 68 Celsius and wait for it to happen. If it is at more than 68 Celsius, it won't happen quicker, or better, or anything. You have no advantages.

At the same time, if you have a higher temperature, you have more trouble. First, you are wasting a lot of energy to keep the stew hotter over many hours. Second, its liquid can boil off, getting the wrong consistency. Third, if the bottom of the pot becomes too hot, it will burn on. Fourth, anything non-meat in there can suffer from the heat - vegetables can overcook, starch can burn onto the bottom, anything planty (vegetables, herbs, spices) can get its taste destroyed).

All in all, if you can cook something on a high or a low temperature, choose the low one, it is generally better for everything. Only choose high for foods which have a narrow temperature range which is high.

  • Cooking on high heat can cause the formation of acrylamide in your food. It's a known cancer risk. Low and slow is the way to go. – user36802 Sep 13 '15 at 11:32
  • 2
    @ChefBrooksie That may or may not be true but it would be inappropriate to discuss here as we intentionally avoid discussing "health" issues other than "is this safe to eat because of food borne illness issues". – Catija Sep 13 '15 at 17:54
  • That's not true. There's plenty of health issues discussed on this forum. My suggestion: Develop clear rules and stick to them. I don't know how you separate health issues from food issues, to be honest. Perhaps I should have paraded my response as " add less acrylamide to your beef chuck roast". If I am being too impertinent, delete my account. The loss is your reader's. I'll survive because I have the knowledge that you blocked. If you want to pigeon hole the definition of healthy food...well...it's not my website. – user36802 Sep 13 '15 at 19:02
  • 1
    @ChefBrooksie What Catija says is true, see cooking.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic. It specifically lists health advice as off topic. Notice that food safety is on-topic, but this is not the same thing as health advice. "Safe food" and "healthy food" are two completely different things, and the second is not allowed here. Also, if you post content which doesn't fit the rules, it is the content which gets deleted, so you can stay active and your other content is still useful to people. We suspend accounts for actively disruptive users, not for not yet having learned what is off topic – rumtscho Sep 13 '15 at 19:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.