Timeline for Is pasteurized milk safe to drink?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2015 at 15:48 | comment | added | Cascabel♦ | @rumtscho Yup, to be clear, I actually upvoted the question. I was just trying to summarize what happened in all the comments, and suggest providing the background to dispel that sort of criticism. | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 15:27 | answer | added | zerobane | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46 | history | edited | Aquarius_Girl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Mar 20, 2015 at 10:37 | comment | added | Aquarius_Girl | @rumtscho call me she. Btw, in my surroundings, I haven't ever seen anyone drinking milk from such packets Without boiling it first. Though I have to say that I am not very sure about why exactly they do it. There are other type of packets from amul for which they explicitly say that you can drink it directly. | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 8:54 | comment | added | rumtscho♦ | @Jefromi this research can be seriously flawed by the type of sources you look at. There are cultures where boiling pasteurized milk is (was?) common, and everybody does it. If the OP grew up in such a culture, and all he has is a certainty that everybody does it and a suspicion that it might not be necessary, he might 1) feel that he has "conducted" research offline, by being aware of the common knowledge, or 2) conduct research in sources from his own culture (e.g. by using his native language for the searches) and have found contradicting sources, or ones repeating the common practice. | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 7:24 | comment | added | Aquarius_Girl | @Jefromi I agree. Next time before posting the question I'd definitely "show" the research efforts. Thanks for being polite. | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 6:58 | comment | added | Cascabel♦ | The main point of all the removed comments: this does show some lack of research effort. If you'd searched for "pasteurized" and seen what the internet has to say about it before asking your question, it might've helped clarify your question or avoided the need to ask it. | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 6:36 | history | edited | Cascabel♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 82 characters in body
|
Mar 20, 2015 at 6:35 | comment | added | Cascabel♦ | (Cleaning up comments now that they're archived and the question is clarified.) | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 6:35 | comment | added | Cascabel♦ | Let us continue this discussion in chat. | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 6:35 | comment | added | Cascabel♦ | @TFD I certainly haven't noticed a systematic problem, but if you think anything is seriously flawed to the point mods need to be involved, flag it. Find me in chat if you want to discuss it. Give it a rest here, though. | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 4:33 | review | Close votes | |||
Mar 25, 2015 at 3:01 | |||||
Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 | history | edited | Cascabel♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 129 characters in body
|
Mar 20, 2015 at 3:03 | vote | accept | Aquarius_Girl | ||
Mar 20, 2015 at 2:38 | answer | added | Catija | timeline score: 5 | |
Mar 20, 2015 at 2:12 | review | Low quality posts | |||
Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 | |||||
Mar 19, 2015 at 23:31 | history | asked | Aquarius_Girl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |